Nothing can be coincidence: synaptic inhibition and plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei

Jason R. Pugh*, Indira M. Raman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many cerebellar neurons fire spontaneously, generating 10-100 action potentials per second even without synaptic input. This high basal activity correlates with information-coding mechanisms that differ from those of cells that are quiescent until excited synaptically. For example, in the deep cerebellar nuclei, Hebbian patterns of coincident synaptic excitation and postsynaptic firing fail to induce long-term increases in the strength of excitatory inputs. Instead, excitatory synaptic currents are potentiated by combinations of inhibition and excitation that resemble the activity of Purkinje and mossy fiber afferents that is predicted to occur during cerebellar associative learning tasks. Such results indicate that circuits with intrinsically active neurons have rules for information transfer and storage that distinguish them from other brain regions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)170-177
Number of pages8
JournalTrends in Neurosciences
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Funding

Supported by the National Institutes of Health ( www.nih.gov ) NIH-NS39395 (I.M.R.). Studies of synaptic plasticity that form the focus of this review were also supported by F31-NS055542 (J.R.P.). We acknowledge members of the Raman laboratory who participated in the work from the laboratory cited in the review, Amy Gustafson, Dan Padgett, Petra Telgkamp, Tina Grieco, Zayd Khaliq and Teresa Aman, in addition to current laboratory members Nan Zheng, Abigail Person, Jason Bant and Mark Benton for discussions, and our collaborator and colleague Catherine Woolley.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nothing can be coincidence: synaptic inhibition and plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this