Nurse Practitioner Certification and Practice Settings: Implications for Education and Practice

Vicki A. Keough*, Autumn Stevenson, Zoran Martinovich, Robert Young, Paula Tanabe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are certified within a population-focused specialty area, practice in a variety of settings, and treat a wide range of patients. Little is known about what agreement exists between certification obtained and actual site of practice. The purpose of this study was to examine NP practice sites as compared with their certification and examine additional education they received after employment. Design: Adult (ANP), family (FNP), and acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) certified by the American Nurses Credentialing Center were surveyed regarding certification, demographic information, practice setting, routine responsibilities, and additional training they may have obtained. Methods: An expert panel defined categories of traditional practice settings consistent with NP credentialing examinations and scopes of practice. Equal numbers of randomly chosen ANPs, ACNPs, and FNPs (N = 2,000) were mailed surveys. Responses were coded and analyzed. Findings: The overall survey response was 69.8% (n= 1216). Of the FNP, ANP, and ACNP respondents, 5%, 7%, and 42%, respectively, reported practicing in a nontraditional practice setting. Of nurses practicing in a nontraditional setting, 74% (135 of 182) were ACNPs, with 90% practicing in a nontraditional, ambulatory care setting. Sixty-five percent (13 of 20) of the FNPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity emergency department, and 56% (15 of 27) of the ANPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity intensive care unit. The top responses of additional education received were pharmacology, laboratory interpretation, and ordering diagnostic tests. Conclusions: While greater than 90% of ANPs and FNPs practice in settings consistent with their certification, a proportion of NPs practice in nontraditional settings and may benefit from additional education (formal, on-the-job, and continuing education) and mentoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-202
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

Nurse Practitioners
Certification
Atrial Natriuretic Factor
Education
Credentialing
Nurses
Continuing Education
Ambulatory Care
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Intensive Care Units
Hospital Emergency Service
Demography
Pharmacology

Keywords

  • Healthcare administration
  • Nurse practitioner
  • Survey research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Keough, Vicki A. ; Stevenson, Autumn ; Martinovich, Zoran ; Young, Robert ; Tanabe, Paula. / Nurse Practitioner Certification and Practice Settings : Implications for Education and Practice. In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 195-202.
@article{3a0c153060bb4ef7964c7122abebb97f,
title = "Nurse Practitioner Certification and Practice Settings: Implications for Education and Practice",
abstract = "Purpose: Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are certified within a population-focused specialty area, practice in a variety of settings, and treat a wide range of patients. Little is known about what agreement exists between certification obtained and actual site of practice. The purpose of this study was to examine NP practice sites as compared with their certification and examine additional education they received after employment. Design: Adult (ANP), family (FNP), and acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) certified by the American Nurses Credentialing Center were surveyed regarding certification, demographic information, practice setting, routine responsibilities, and additional training they may have obtained. Methods: An expert panel defined categories of traditional practice settings consistent with NP credentialing examinations and scopes of practice. Equal numbers of randomly chosen ANPs, ACNPs, and FNPs (N = 2,000) were mailed surveys. Responses were coded and analyzed. Findings: The overall survey response was 69.8{\%} (n= 1216). Of the FNP, ANP, and ACNP respondents, 5{\%}, 7{\%}, and 42{\%}, respectively, reported practicing in a nontraditional practice setting. Of nurses practicing in a nontraditional setting, 74{\%} (135 of 182) were ACNPs, with 90{\%} practicing in a nontraditional, ambulatory care setting. Sixty-five percent (13 of 20) of the FNPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity emergency department, and 56{\%} (15 of 27) of the ANPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity intensive care unit. The top responses of additional education received were pharmacology, laboratory interpretation, and ordering diagnostic tests. Conclusions: While greater than 90{\%} of ANPs and FNPs practice in settings consistent with their certification, a proportion of NPs practice in nontraditional settings and may benefit from additional education (formal, on-the-job, and continuing education) and mentoring.",
keywords = "Healthcare administration, Nurse practitioner, Survey research",
author = "Keough, {Vicki A.} and Autumn Stevenson and Zoran Martinovich and Robert Young and Paula Tanabe",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01395.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "195--202",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Scholarship",
issn = "1527-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Nurse Practitioner Certification and Practice Settings : Implications for Education and Practice. / Keough, Vicki A.; Stevenson, Autumn; Martinovich, Zoran; Young, Robert; Tanabe, Paula.

In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.06.2011, p. 195-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurse Practitioner Certification and Practice Settings

T2 - Implications for Education and Practice

AU - Keough, Vicki A.

AU - Stevenson, Autumn

AU - Martinovich, Zoran

AU - Young, Robert

AU - Tanabe, Paula

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Purpose: Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are certified within a population-focused specialty area, practice in a variety of settings, and treat a wide range of patients. Little is known about what agreement exists between certification obtained and actual site of practice. The purpose of this study was to examine NP practice sites as compared with their certification and examine additional education they received after employment. Design: Adult (ANP), family (FNP), and acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) certified by the American Nurses Credentialing Center were surveyed regarding certification, demographic information, practice setting, routine responsibilities, and additional training they may have obtained. Methods: An expert panel defined categories of traditional practice settings consistent with NP credentialing examinations and scopes of practice. Equal numbers of randomly chosen ANPs, ACNPs, and FNPs (N = 2,000) were mailed surveys. Responses were coded and analyzed. Findings: The overall survey response was 69.8% (n= 1216). Of the FNP, ANP, and ACNP respondents, 5%, 7%, and 42%, respectively, reported practicing in a nontraditional practice setting. Of nurses practicing in a nontraditional setting, 74% (135 of 182) were ACNPs, with 90% practicing in a nontraditional, ambulatory care setting. Sixty-five percent (13 of 20) of the FNPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity emergency department, and 56% (15 of 27) of the ANPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity intensive care unit. The top responses of additional education received were pharmacology, laboratory interpretation, and ordering diagnostic tests. Conclusions: While greater than 90% of ANPs and FNPs practice in settings consistent with their certification, a proportion of NPs practice in nontraditional settings and may benefit from additional education (formal, on-the-job, and continuing education) and mentoring.

AB - Purpose: Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are certified within a population-focused specialty area, practice in a variety of settings, and treat a wide range of patients. Little is known about what agreement exists between certification obtained and actual site of practice. The purpose of this study was to examine NP practice sites as compared with their certification and examine additional education they received after employment. Design: Adult (ANP), family (FNP), and acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) certified by the American Nurses Credentialing Center were surveyed regarding certification, demographic information, practice setting, routine responsibilities, and additional training they may have obtained. Methods: An expert panel defined categories of traditional practice settings consistent with NP credentialing examinations and scopes of practice. Equal numbers of randomly chosen ANPs, ACNPs, and FNPs (N = 2,000) were mailed surveys. Responses were coded and analyzed. Findings: The overall survey response was 69.8% (n= 1216). Of the FNP, ANP, and ACNP respondents, 5%, 7%, and 42%, respectively, reported practicing in a nontraditional practice setting. Of nurses practicing in a nontraditional setting, 74% (135 of 182) were ACNPs, with 90% practicing in a nontraditional, ambulatory care setting. Sixty-five percent (13 of 20) of the FNPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity emergency department, and 56% (15 of 27) of the ANPs practicing in a nontraditional setting were practicing in a high-acuity intensive care unit. The top responses of additional education received were pharmacology, laboratory interpretation, and ordering diagnostic tests. Conclusions: While greater than 90% of ANPs and FNPs practice in settings consistent with their certification, a proportion of NPs practice in nontraditional settings and may benefit from additional education (formal, on-the-job, and continuing education) and mentoring.

KW - Healthcare administration

KW - Nurse practitioner

KW - Survey research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956273522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956273522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01395.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01395.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21605324

AN - SCOPUS:79956273522

VL - 43

SP - 195

EP - 202

JO - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

JF - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

SN - 1527-6546

IS - 2

ER -