Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy

Richard S. Finkel*, Eugenio Mercuri, Basil T. Darras, Anne M. Connolly, Nancy L. Kuntz, Janbernd Kirschner, Claudia A. Chiriboga, Kayoko Saito, Laurent Servais, Eduardo Tizzano, Haluk Topaloglu, Már Tulinius, Jacqueline Montes, Allan M. Glanzman, Kathie Bishop, Z. John Zhong, Sarah Gheuens, C. Frank Bennett, Eugene Schneider, Wildon FarwellDarryl C. De Vivo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1649 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder that is caused by an insufficient level of survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Nusinersen is an antisense oligonucleotide drug that modifies pre–messenger RNA splicing of the SMN2 gene and thus promotes increased production of full-length SMN protein. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, phase 3 efficacy and safety trial of nusinersen in infants with spinal muscular atrophy. The primary end points were a motor-milestone response (defined according to results on the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination) and event-free survival (time to death or the use of permanent assisted ventilation). Secondary end points included overall survival and subgroup analyses of event-free survival according to disease duration at screening. Only the first primary end point was tested in a prespecified interim analysis. To control the overall type I error rate at 0.05, a hierarchical testing strategy was used for the second primary end point and the secondary end points in the final analysis. RESULTS: In the interim analysis, a significantly higher percentage of infants in the nusinersen group than in the control group had a motor-milestone response (21 of 51 infants [41%] vs. 0 of 27 [0%], P<0.001), and this result prompted early termination of the trial. In the final analysis, a significantly higher percentage of infants in the nusinersen group than in the control group had a motor-milestone response (37 of 73 infants [51%] vs. 0 of 37 [0%]), and the likelihood of event-free survival was higher in the nusinersen group than in the control group (hazard ratio for death or the use of permanent assisted ventilation, 0.53; P=0.005). The likelihood of overall survival was higher in the nusinersen group than in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.37; P=0.004), and infants with a shorter disease duration at screening were more likely than those with a longer disease duration to benefit from nusinersen. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among infants with spinal muscular atrophy, those who received nusinersen were more likely to be alive and have improvements in motor function than those in the control group. Early treatment may be necessary to maximize the benefit of the drug.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1723-1732
Number of pages10
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume377
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2017

Funding

Supported by Biogen and Ionis Pharmaceuticals. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org. We thank the patients who participated in the trial and their parents, guardians, and family members; all contributors to the trial, including the clinical monitors, trial coordinators, physical therapists, pharmacists, laboratory technicians, and members of patient advocacy groups (who assisted in promoting awareness of the trial); Allison Green from Excel Scientific Solutions for providing writing assistance with earlier versions of the manuscript according to input from authors; and Jacqueline Atkinson from Excel Scientific Solutions for copy editing an earlier version of the manuscript.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this