Abstract
The performance and movement efficiency of prosthesis users while traversing a multisectional obstacle course (OC) were evaluated using a crossover design with random allocation of three prosthetic knee joints: the SNS (CaTech; Dayton, Ohio) the C-Leg (Otto Bock; Duderstadt, Germany), and the 3R60 (Otto Bock). Twelve users completed the OC twice with each joint, once without and once with a mental loading task (MLT). The performance was objectively assessed using time measurement from digital video recordings, and the Total Heart Beat Index was used to estimate movement efficiency. A 1 mo familiarization period was provided for each knee joint before data collection. It took longer to complete the OC with the 3R60 compared with either the SNS or the C-Leg. No significant time differences were found between the C-Leg and the SNS, but differences between the 3R60 and the SNS (slalom and rock sections) and between the 3R60 and the C-Leg (rock section) were observed. Within the simulated sand section, two participants fell with the C-Leg, one with the 3R60, and none with the SNS. Movement efficiency without MLT was similar between all joints, but with an MLT a significant decrease in movement efficiency was observed with the C-Leg. Previous experience using an SNS had no influence on the results.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 583-596 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2012 |
Keywords
- 3R60
- C-Leg
- Maneuverability
- Mental loading task
- Movement efficiency
- Obstacle course
- Prosthetic knee joint
- SNS
- Total Heart Beat Index
- Walking
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Rehabilitation