TY - JOUR
T1 - Olaparib for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Alterations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 in the PROfound Trial
AU - Mateo, Joaquin
AU - De Bono, Johann S.
AU - Fizazi, Karim
AU - Saad, Fred
AU - Shore, Neal
AU - Sandhu, Shahneen
AU - Chi, Kim N.
AU - Agarwal, Neeraj
AU - Olmos, David
AU - Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine
AU - Özgüroǧlu, Mustafa
AU - Mehra, Niven
AU - Matsubara, Nobuaki
AU - Young Joung, Jae
AU - Padua, Charles
AU - Korbenfeld, Ernesto
AU - Kang, Jinyu
AU - Marshall, Helen
AU - Lai, Zhongwu
AU - Barnicle, Alan
AU - Poehlein, Christian
AU - Lukashchuk, Natalia
AU - Hussain, Maha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2024/2/10
Y1 - 2024/2/10
N2 - PURPOSEPhase III PROfound trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02987543) met its primary and key secondary objectives, demonstrating significantly longer radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) with olaparib monotherapy versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (control) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 (BRCA), and/or ATM (cohort A) whose disease had progressed on prior next-generation hormonal agent (NHA). We report exploratory post hoc analysis of the subgroup of patients with mCRPC with BRCA alterations in PROfound.METHODSAll patients had an alteration in a homologous recombination repair gene by tumor tissue testing, of which 160 had underlying BRCA alterations. rPFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Confirmed objective response rate and safety were also assessed.RESULTSOlaparib was associated with longer rPFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.32]) and OS (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.95]) than control. There was an rPFS benefit with olaparib in all zygosity subgroups (biallelic [n = 88]; HR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.16], heterozygous [n = 15] and unknown [n = 57]; HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.60]). Patients with BRCA2 homozygous deletions experienced prolonged responses to olaparib (n = 16; median rPFS, 16.6 months [95% CI, 9.3 to not reached]). Some evaluations are limited by small patient numbers. Germline DNA analysis was performed for 112 (70%) patients; risk of disease progression was similar for patients with germline (n = 61; HR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.18]) and somatic (n = 51; HR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.37]) BRCA alterations.CONCLUSIONIn all subgroups assessed, olaparib improved outcomes versus abiraterone or enzalutamide for patients with mCRPC with BRCA alterations whose disease had progressed on previous NHA.
AB - PURPOSEPhase III PROfound trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02987543) met its primary and key secondary objectives, demonstrating significantly longer radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) with olaparib monotherapy versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (control) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 (BRCA), and/or ATM (cohort A) whose disease had progressed on prior next-generation hormonal agent (NHA). We report exploratory post hoc analysis of the subgroup of patients with mCRPC with BRCA alterations in PROfound.METHODSAll patients had an alteration in a homologous recombination repair gene by tumor tissue testing, of which 160 had underlying BRCA alterations. rPFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Confirmed objective response rate and safety were also assessed.RESULTSOlaparib was associated with longer rPFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.32]) and OS (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.95]) than control. There was an rPFS benefit with olaparib in all zygosity subgroups (biallelic [n = 88]; HR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.16], heterozygous [n = 15] and unknown [n = 57]; HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.60]). Patients with BRCA2 homozygous deletions experienced prolonged responses to olaparib (n = 16; median rPFS, 16.6 months [95% CI, 9.3 to not reached]). Some evaluations are limited by small patient numbers. Germline DNA analysis was performed for 112 (70%) patients; risk of disease progression was similar for patients with germline (n = 61; HR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.18]) and somatic (n = 51; HR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.37]) BRCA alterations.CONCLUSIONIn all subgroups assessed, olaparib improved outcomes versus abiraterone or enzalutamide for patients with mCRPC with BRCA alterations whose disease had progressed on previous NHA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181904134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181904134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.23.00339
DO - 10.1200/JCO.23.00339
M3 - Article
C2 - 37963304
AN - SCOPUS:85181904134
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 42
SP - 571
EP - 583
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 5
ER -