On hughes's contribution the limits of advocacy research7

Paul M. Hirsch

doi:10.1086/268609

On hughes's contribution the limits of advocacy research⁷

Paul M. Hirsch

Management and Organizations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	411-413
Number of pages	3
Journal	Public Opinion Quarterly
Volume	44
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1086/268609
State	Published - 1980

Funding

7The research on which this comment is based was generously supported by the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation. The writer is grateful to Horace Newcomb, Thomas Panelas, and Sally Kilgore for their suggestions and critique. 8 "The 'scary world' of the nonviewer and other anomalies: a reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis." Communication Research 7 (October 1980).

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Communication
History
Sociology and Political Science
General Social Sciences
History and Philosophy of Science

Access to Document

10.1086/268609

Cite this

@article{a02d58aef0eb41558f6503077c06163a,

title = "On hughes's contribution the limits of advocacy research7",

author = "Hirsch, {Paul M.}",

note = "Funding Information: 7The research on which this comment is based was generously supported by the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation. The writer is grateful to Horace Newcomb, Thomas Panelas, and Sally Kilgore for their suggestions and critique. 8 {"}The 'scary world' of the nonviewer and other anomalies: a reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis.{"} Communication Research 7 (October 1980).",

year = "1980",

doi = "10.1086/268609",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "44",

pages = "411--413",

journal = "Public Opinion Quarterly",

issn = "0033-362X",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On hughes's contribution the limits of advocacy research7

AU - Hirsch, Paul M.

N1 - Funding Information: 7The research on which this comment is based was generously supported by the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation. The writer is grateful to Horace Newcomb, Thomas Panelas, and Sally Kilgore for their suggestions and critique. 8 "The 'scary world' of the nonviewer and other anomalies: a reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis." Communication Research 7 (October 1980).

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950944287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950944287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/268609

DO - 10.1086/268609

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84950944287

SN - 0033-362X

VL - 44

SP - 411

EP - 413

JO - Public Opinion Quarterly

JF - Public Opinion Quarterly

IS - 3

ER -