On the Origin of GW190521-like Events from Repeated Black Hole Mergers in Star Clusters

Giacomo Fragione*, Abraham Loeb, Frederic A. Rasio

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

LIGO and Virgo have reported the detection of GW190521, from the merger of a binary black hole (BBH) with a total mass around 150 M o˙. While current stellar models limit the mass of any black hole (BH) remnant to about 40-50 M o˙, more massive BHs can be produced dynamically through repeated mergers in the core of a dense star cluster. The process is limited by the recoil kick (due to anisotropic emission of gravitational radiation) imparted to merger remnants, which can escape the parent cluster, thereby terminating growth. We study the role of the host cluster metallicity and escape speed in the buildup of massive BHs through repeated mergers. Almost independent of host metallicity, we find that a BBH of about 150 M o˙ could be formed dynamically in any star cluster with escape speed ⪆200 km s-1, as found in galactic nuclear star clusters as well as the most massive globular clusters and super star clusters. Using an inspiral-only waveform, we compute the detection probability for different primary masses (≥60 M o˙) as a function of secondary mass and find that the detection probability increases with secondary mass and decreases for larger primary mass and redshift. Future additional detections of massive BBH mergers will be of fundamental importance for understanding the growth of massive BHs through dynamics and the formation of intermediate-mass BHs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberL26
JournalAstrophysical Journal Letters
Volume902
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 10 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the Origin of GW190521-like Events from Repeated Black Hole Mergers in Star Clusters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this