TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncofertility considerations in adolescents and young adults given a diagnosis of melanoma
T2 - Fertility risk of Food and Drug Administration–approved systemic therapies
AU - Walter, Jessica R.
AU - Xu, Shuai
AU - Paller, Amy S.
AU - Choi, Jennifer N.
AU - Woodruff, Teresa K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
PY - 2016/9
Y1 - 2016/9
N2 - Background Melanoma is the most common cancer diagnosed for patients ages 25 to 29 years, the group with the highest birth rates in the United States. Oncofertility is a new field addressing the reproductive needs of patients with cancer facing fertility-threatening treatments. Objective We sought to assess gender-specific fertility risk for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved melanoma therapies with a new risk category system. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of FDA, European Union, and Health Canada regulatory filings, along with previously published reports to grade fertility risk of systemic melanoma therapies. The proposed fertility risk category system is analogous to the FDA's A/B/C/D/X/N pregnancy-risk categories. Results For female patients, 58% of treatments represent a fertility risk (Category C and D), 33% have unknown risk (Category N), and 1 therapy (vemurafenib) did not show animal ovarian toxicity (Category B). For male patients, 33% represented a fertility risk (Category C and D), 50% of treatments had unknown risk (Category N), and 17% did not show animal testicular toxicity (Category B). Limitations Data on fertility risk for melanoma therapies approved after 2009 are limited to preclinical animal studies. Conclusion Dermatologists have an opportunity to discuss fertility preservation, make appropriate referrals, and steward registries on reproductive outcomes for patients with melanoma.
AB - Background Melanoma is the most common cancer diagnosed for patients ages 25 to 29 years, the group with the highest birth rates in the United States. Oncofertility is a new field addressing the reproductive needs of patients with cancer facing fertility-threatening treatments. Objective We sought to assess gender-specific fertility risk for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved melanoma therapies with a new risk category system. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of FDA, European Union, and Health Canada regulatory filings, along with previously published reports to grade fertility risk of systemic melanoma therapies. The proposed fertility risk category system is analogous to the FDA's A/B/C/D/X/N pregnancy-risk categories. Results For female patients, 58% of treatments represent a fertility risk (Category C and D), 33% have unknown risk (Category N), and 1 therapy (vemurafenib) did not show animal ovarian toxicity (Category B). For male patients, 33% represented a fertility risk (Category C and D), 50% of treatments had unknown risk (Category N), and 17% did not show animal testicular toxicity (Category B). Limitations Data on fertility risk for melanoma therapies approved after 2009 are limited to preclinical animal studies. Conclusion Dermatologists have an opportunity to discuss fertility preservation, make appropriate referrals, and steward registries on reproductive outcomes for patients with melanoma.
KW - cancer survivorship
KW - melanoma
KW - oncofertility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011720874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011720874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.04.031
DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.04.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 27543212
AN - SCOPUS:85011720874
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 75
SP - 528
EP - 534
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 3
ER -