One size fits all? - Part 2

Benchmarking results

Michael Stonebraker*, Chuck Bear, Uur Çetintemel, Mitch Cherniack, Tingjian Ge, Nabil Hachem, Stavros Harizopoulos, John Lifter, Jennie Rogers, Stan Zdonik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two years ago, some of us wrote a paper predicting the demise of "One Size Fits All (OSFA)" [Sto05a]. In that paper, we examined the stream processing and data warehouse markets and gave reasons for a substantial performance advantage to specialized architectures in both markets. Herein, we make three additional contributions. First, we present reasons why the same performance advantage is enjoyed by specialized implementations in the text processing market. Second, the major contribution of the paper is to show "apples to apples" performance numbers between commercial implementations of specialized architectures and relational DBMSs in both stream processing and data warehouses. Finally, we also show comparison numbers between an academic prototype of a specialized architecture for scientific and intelligence applications, a relational DBMS, and a widely used mathematical computation tool. In summary, there appear to be at least four markets where specialized architectures enjoy an overwhelming performance advantage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research
Pages173-184
Number of pages12
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007
Event3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, CIDR 2007 - Asilomar, CA, United States
Duration: Jan 7 2007Jan 10 2007

Other

Other3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, CIDR 2007
CountryUnited States
CityAsilomar, CA
Period1/7/071/10/07

Fingerprint

Data warehouses
Benchmarking
Text processing
Processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Cite this

Stonebraker, M., Bear, C., Çetintemel, U., Cherniack, M., Ge, T., Hachem, N., ... Zdonik, S. (2007). One size fits all? - Part 2: Benchmarking results. In CIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (pp. 173-184)
Stonebraker, Michael ; Bear, Chuck ; Çetintemel, Uur ; Cherniack, Mitch ; Ge, Tingjian ; Hachem, Nabil ; Harizopoulos, Stavros ; Lifter, John ; Rogers, Jennie ; Zdonik, Stan. / One size fits all? - Part 2 : Benchmarking results. CIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research. 2007. pp. 173-184
@inproceedings{38143bf027374408b9a1809ba9ed030f,
title = "One size fits all? - Part 2: Benchmarking results",
abstract = "Two years ago, some of us wrote a paper predicting the demise of {"}One Size Fits All (OSFA){"} [Sto05a]. In that paper, we examined the stream processing and data warehouse markets and gave reasons for a substantial performance advantage to specialized architectures in both markets. Herein, we make three additional contributions. First, we present reasons why the same performance advantage is enjoyed by specialized implementations in the text processing market. Second, the major contribution of the paper is to show {"}apples to apples{"} performance numbers between commercial implementations of specialized architectures and relational DBMSs in both stream processing and data warehouses. Finally, we also show comparison numbers between an academic prototype of a specialized architecture for scientific and intelligence applications, a relational DBMS, and a widely used mathematical computation tool. In summary, there appear to be at least four markets where specialized architectures enjoy an overwhelming performance advantage.",
author = "Michael Stonebraker and Chuck Bear and Uur {\cC}etintemel and Mitch Cherniack and Tingjian Ge and Nabil Hachem and Stavros Harizopoulos and John Lifter and Jennie Rogers and Stan Zdonik",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "173--184",
booktitle = "CIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research",

}

Stonebraker, M, Bear, C, Çetintemel, U, Cherniack, M, Ge, T, Hachem, N, Harizopoulos, S, Lifter, J, Rogers, J & Zdonik, S 2007, One size fits all? - Part 2: Benchmarking results. in CIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research. pp. 173-184, 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, CIDR 2007, Asilomar, CA, United States, 1/7/07.

One size fits all? - Part 2 : Benchmarking results. / Stonebraker, Michael; Bear, Chuck; Çetintemel, Uur; Cherniack, Mitch; Ge, Tingjian; Hachem, Nabil; Harizopoulos, Stavros; Lifter, John; Rogers, Jennie; Zdonik, Stan.

CIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research. 2007. p. 173-184.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - One size fits all? - Part 2

T2 - Benchmarking results

AU - Stonebraker, Michael

AU - Bear, Chuck

AU - Çetintemel, Uur

AU - Cherniack, Mitch

AU - Ge, Tingjian

AU - Hachem, Nabil

AU - Harizopoulos, Stavros

AU - Lifter, John

AU - Rogers, Jennie

AU - Zdonik, Stan

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Two years ago, some of us wrote a paper predicting the demise of "One Size Fits All (OSFA)" [Sto05a]. In that paper, we examined the stream processing and data warehouse markets and gave reasons for a substantial performance advantage to specialized architectures in both markets. Herein, we make three additional contributions. First, we present reasons why the same performance advantage is enjoyed by specialized implementations in the text processing market. Second, the major contribution of the paper is to show "apples to apples" performance numbers between commercial implementations of specialized architectures and relational DBMSs in both stream processing and data warehouses. Finally, we also show comparison numbers between an academic prototype of a specialized architecture for scientific and intelligence applications, a relational DBMS, and a widely used mathematical computation tool. In summary, there appear to be at least four markets where specialized architectures enjoy an overwhelming performance advantage.

AB - Two years ago, some of us wrote a paper predicting the demise of "One Size Fits All (OSFA)" [Sto05a]. In that paper, we examined the stream processing and data warehouse markets and gave reasons for a substantial performance advantage to specialized architectures in both markets. Herein, we make three additional contributions. First, we present reasons why the same performance advantage is enjoyed by specialized implementations in the text processing market. Second, the major contribution of the paper is to show "apples to apples" performance numbers between commercial implementations of specialized architectures and relational DBMSs in both stream processing and data warehouses. Finally, we also show comparison numbers between an academic prototype of a specialized architecture for scientific and intelligence applications, a relational DBMS, and a widely used mathematical computation tool. In summary, there appear to be at least four markets where specialized architectures enjoy an overwhelming performance advantage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75949100918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75949100918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 173

EP - 184

BT - CIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research

ER -

Stonebraker M, Bear C, Çetintemel U, Cherniack M, Ge T, Hachem N et al. One size fits all? - Part 2: Benchmarking results. In CIDR 2007 - 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research. 2007. p. 173-184