Operating principles versus operating conditions in the distinction between associative and propositional processes

Bertram Gawronski; Galen V. Bodenhausen

doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000958

Operating principles versus operating conditions in the distinction between associative and propositional processes

Bertram Gawronski^*, Galen V. Bodenhausen

^*Corresponding author for this work

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Drawing on our Associative-Propositional Evaluation (APE) Model, we argue for the usefulness of distinguishing between basic operating principles of learning processes (associative linking vs. propositional reasoning) and secondary features pertaining to the conditions of their operation (automatic vs. controlled). We review empirical evidence that supports the joint operation of associative and propositional processes in the formation of new associations.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	207-208
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	32
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000958
State	Published - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X09000958

Cite this

@article{6217a2cd4f50496fb199cb07584b876a,

title = "Operating principles versus operating conditions in the distinction between associative and propositional processes",

abstract = "Drawing on our Associative-Propositional Evaluation (APE) Model, we argue for the usefulness of distinguishing between basic operating principles of learning processes (associative linking vs. propositional reasoning) and secondary features pertaining to the conditions of their operation (automatic vs. controlled). We review empirical evidence that supports the joint operation of associative and propositional processes in the formation of new associations.",

author = "Bertram Gawronski and Bodenhausen, {Galen V.}",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X09000958",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "32",

pages = "207--208",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operating principles versus operating conditions in the distinction between associative and propositional processes

AU - Gawronski, Bertram

AU - Bodenhausen, Galen V.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Drawing on our Associative-Propositional Evaluation (APE) Model, we argue for the usefulness of distinguishing between basic operating principles of learning processes (associative linking vs. propositional reasoning) and secondary features pertaining to the conditions of their operation (automatic vs. controlled). We review empirical evidence that supports the joint operation of associative and propositional processes in the formation of new associations.

AB - Drawing on our Associative-Propositional Evaluation (APE) Model, we argue for the usefulness of distinguishing between basic operating principles of learning processes (associative linking vs. propositional reasoning) and secondary features pertaining to the conditions of their operation (automatic vs. controlled). We review empirical evidence that supports the joint operation of associative and propositional processes in the formation of new associations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349188494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349188494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X09000958

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X09000958

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:70349188494

VL - 32

SP - 207

EP - 208

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 2

ER -

Operating principles versus operating conditions in the distinction between associative and propositional processes

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this