Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: Effects of acute and chronic deafening

Claus Peter Richter*, Rodrigo Bayon, Agnella D. Izzo, Margarete Otting, Eul Suh, Sheila Goyal, Jeffrey Hotaling, Joseph T. Walsh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

In developing neural prostheses, particular success has been realized with cochlear implants. These devices bypass damaged hair cells in the auditory system and electrically stimulate the auditory nerve directly. In contemporary cochlear implants, however, the injected electric current spreads widely along the scala tympani and across turns. Consequently, stimulation of spatially discrete spiral ganglion cell populations is difficult. In contrast to electrical stimulation, it has been shown that extremely spatially selective stimulation is possible using infrared radiation (e.g. [Izzo, A.D., Su, H.S., Pathria, J., Walsh Jr., J.T., Whitlon, D.S., Richter, C.-P., 2007a. Selectivity of neural stimulation in the auditory system: a comparison of optic and electric stimuli. J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 1-7]). Here, we explore the correlation between surviving spiral ganglion cells, following acute and chronic deafness induced by neomycin application into the middle ear, and neural stimulation using optical radiation and electrical current. In vivo experiments were conducted in gerbils. Before the animals were deafened, acoustic thresholds were obtained and neurons were stimulated with optical radiation at various pulse durations, radiation exposures, and pulse repetition rates. In one group of animals, measurements were made immediately after deafening, while the other group was tested at least four weeks after deafening. Deafness was confirmed by measuring acoustically evoked compound action potentials. Optically and electrically evoked compound action potentials and auditory brainstem responses were determined for different radiation exposures and for different electrical current amplitudes, respectively. After completion of the experiments, the animals were euthanized and the cochleae were harvested for histology. Acoustically evoked compound action potential thresholds were elevated by more than 40 dB after neomycin application in acutely deaf and more than 60 dB in chronically deaf animals. Compound action potential thresholds, which were determined with optical radiation pulses, were not significantly elevated in acutely deaf animals. However, in chronically deaf animals optically evoked CAP thresholds were elevated. Changes correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and the optical parameters that were used for stimulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-51
Number of pages10
JournalHearing research
Volume242
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Keywords

  • Cochlea
  • Cochlear implants
  • Deafening
  • Optical stimulation
  • Spatial selectivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: Effects of acute and chronic deafening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this