TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal strategies for the diagnosis of community-onset diarrhea in solid organ transplant recipients
T2 - Less is more
AU - Trinh, Sonya A.
AU - Echenique, Ignacio A.
AU - Penugonda, Sudhir
AU - Angarone, Michael P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Oluwatoyosi Akinlade performed data retrieval for the time-to-event analysis. Nathaniel Rhodes conceived the idea of a stepwise testing model for the cost analysis. This study utilized data derived from the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse Pilot Data Program, supported by the National Center for Research Resources (Grant 5UL1RR025741), now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (Grant 8UL1TR000150).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Background: Diarrhea, a common complication after solid organ transplant (SOT), is associated with allograft failure and death. No evidence-based guidelines exist for the evaluation of diarrhea in SOT recipients. We performed a cost analysis to derive a testing algorithm for the diagnosis of community-onset diarrhea that minimizes costs without compromising diagnostic yields. Design: A cost analysis was performed on a retrospective cohort of 422 SOT admissions for community-onset diarrhea over an 18-month period. A stepwise testing model was applied on a population level to assess test costs relative to diagnostic yields. Results: Over an 18-month period, 1564 diagnostic tests were performed and 127 (8.1%) returned positive. Diagnostic testing accounted for $95 625 of hospital costs. The tests with the lowest cost per decrease in the false-omission rate (FOR) were stool Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ($156), serum cytomegalovirus quantitative PCR ($1529), stool norovirus (NV) PCR ($4673), and stool culture ($6804). A time-to-event analysis found no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between patients with and without NV testing (P=.520). Conclusions: A stepwise testing strategy can reduce costs without compromising diagnostic yields. In the first-stage testing, we recommend assessment for C. difficile, cytomegalovirus, and food-borne bacterial pathogens. For persistent diarrheal episodes, second-stage evaluation should include stool NV PCR, Giardia/Cryptosporidium enzyme immunoassay, stool ova and parasite, reductions in immunosuppressive therapy, and possibly endoscopy. Although NV testing had a relatively low cost per FOR, we recommend NV testing during second-stage evaluation, as an NV diagnosis may not lead to changes in clinical management or further reductions in length of hospital stay.
AB - Background: Diarrhea, a common complication after solid organ transplant (SOT), is associated with allograft failure and death. No evidence-based guidelines exist for the evaluation of diarrhea in SOT recipients. We performed a cost analysis to derive a testing algorithm for the diagnosis of community-onset diarrhea that minimizes costs without compromising diagnostic yields. Design: A cost analysis was performed on a retrospective cohort of 422 SOT admissions for community-onset diarrhea over an 18-month period. A stepwise testing model was applied on a population level to assess test costs relative to diagnostic yields. Results: Over an 18-month period, 1564 diagnostic tests were performed and 127 (8.1%) returned positive. Diagnostic testing accounted for $95 625 of hospital costs. The tests with the lowest cost per decrease in the false-omission rate (FOR) were stool Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ($156), serum cytomegalovirus quantitative PCR ($1529), stool norovirus (NV) PCR ($4673), and stool culture ($6804). A time-to-event analysis found no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between patients with and without NV testing (P=.520). Conclusions: A stepwise testing strategy can reduce costs without compromising diagnostic yields. In the first-stage testing, we recommend assessment for C. difficile, cytomegalovirus, and food-borne bacterial pathogens. For persistent diarrheal episodes, second-stage evaluation should include stool NV PCR, Giardia/Cryptosporidium enzyme immunoassay, stool ova and parasite, reductions in immunosuppressive therapy, and possibly endoscopy. Although NV testing had a relatively low cost per FOR, we recommend NV testing during second-stage evaluation, as an NV diagnosis may not lead to changes in clinical management or further reductions in length of hospital stay.
KW - Clostridium difficile
KW - cost analysis
KW - cytomegalovirus
KW - diarrhea
KW - norovirus
KW - solid organ transplant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017035600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017035600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/tid.12673
DO - 10.1111/tid.12673
M3 - Article
C2 - 28170133
AN - SCOPUS:85017035600
SN - 1398-2273
VL - 19
JO - Transplant Infectious Disease
JF - Transplant Infectious Disease
IS - 2
M1 - e12673
ER -