Optimal timing and treatment strategy for pancreatic cancer

Adriana C. Gamboa, Manali Rupji, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, Rachel M. Lee, Michael K. Turgeon, Benjamin I. Meyer, Maria C. Russell, Kenneth Cardona, David A. Kooby, Shishir K. Maithel, Mihir M. Shah*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: For pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), no studies have established any association between earlier treatment initiation and long-term outcomes. In addition, an optimal type of initial treatment for the localized disease remains ill-defined. Methods: Patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) with clinical stage I (CS-I) and II (CS-II) PDAC who underwent curative-intent resection were included. Optimal time from diagnosis-to-treatment including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, or upfront surgery was assessed. An optimal type of treatment was evaluated. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results: Among 29 167 patients, starting any treatment within 0 to 6 weeks was associated with improved median OS compared with 7 to 12 weeks (21.0 vs 20.1 months; P =.004). This persisted when accounting for sex, race, and Charlson-Deyo score (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; P = 0.02) and on subset analysis for CS-I (23.5 vs 21.8 months; P =.04) and CS-II (19.4 vs 18.3 months; P =.03). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (25.6 vs 22.7 months; P <.0001) or US (25.6 vs 20.1 months; P <.0001) even when accounting for sex, race, and Charlson-Deyo score (neoadjuvant chemoradiation: HR, 0.86; P <.001; US: HR, 0.79; P <.001). This improvement persisted in subset analysis with NC compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CS-I: 28.6 vs 25.0 months; CS-II: 25.0 vs 22.9 months; both P <.0001) and to US (CS-I: 28.6 vs 22.9 months; CS-II: 24.7 vs 18.4 months; both P <.0001). On multivariable analysis for each CS-I/CS-II, NC remained associated with 20% improved survival compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or upfront surgery. Conclusions: For PDAC, initiation of therapy within 6 weeks from diagnosis is associated with improved survival, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with the best survival compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or upfront surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-468
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of surgical oncology
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020

Funding

The research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number P30CA138292. It was also supported in parts by the Katz Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number P30CA138292. It was also supported in parts by the Katz Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Keywords

  • neoadjuvant therapy
  • optimal treatments
  • pancreas cancer
  • time-to-treatment
  • treatment delay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal timing and treatment strategy for pancreatic cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this