Optimal use of orders not to intervene and advance directives

Charles W. Plows*, Santa Ana, Robert M. Tenery, Alan Hartford, Dwight Miller, Leonard J. Morse, Herbert Rakatansky, Frank A. Riddick, Victoria Ruff, George T. Wilkins, Linda L. Emanuel, Michael L. Ile, Stephen R. Latham, Jeffrey C. Munson, Jessica Berg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


More rigorous efforts in advance care planning are required in order to tailor end-of-life care to the preferences of patients so that they can experience a satisfactory last chapter of their lives. There is need for better availability and tracking of advance directives, and more uniform adoption of form documents that can be honored in every state. The discouraging evidence of inadequate end-of-life decision making indicates the necessity of several improvement strategies. In response to this need, the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association has examined this issue again and presents the following report and recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)668-675
Number of pages8
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal use of orders not to intervene and advance directives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this