Originalism, abortion, and the Thirteenth Amendment

Andrew M M Koppelman*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Does an originalist reading of the Thirteenth Amendment support a right to abortion? Not long ago a negative answer seemed obvious enough to make the question silly. Since then, however, originalism has become more sophisticated. It is now understood that original meaning, not original intent, is the most appropriate originalist source of constitutional law. The original meaning of constitutional language sometimes focuses on paradigm cases: specific evils that the Constitution aims to keep from recurring. The Thirteenth Amendment's purpose is to end the specific institution of antebellum slavery. A ban on abortion would do to women what slavery did to the women who were enslaved: compel them to bear children against their will.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1917-1946
    Number of pages30
    JournalColumbia Law Review
    Volume112
    Issue number9
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Originalism, abortion, and the Thirteenth Amendment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this