Orthotists’ and physical therapists’ perspectives on quality of care indicators for persons with custom ankle-foot orthoses

Allen Walter Heinemann*, Stefania Fatone, Sherri L LaVela, Billie C.S. Slater, Anne Frances Deutsch, Michelle Peterson, Nicole T. Soltys, Vari McPherson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the priorities of orthotists and physical therapists about quality measurement themes, and the feasibility and utility of collecting data from persons using custom AFOs that could inform quality measure development. Materials and Methods: Online survey assessed respondents’ perspectives and experiences. An Advisory Committee representing professional, organizational, and accreditor groups distributed survey invitations. Results: 461 orthotists and 153 physical therapists completed part or all of the survey; 60% rated 9 quality themes and 20 quality of care topics as extremely important, and 12 standard instruments as feasible and good to use for quality measurement. Patients were the preferred source of information for ease of scheduling, device weight, ease of donning and doffing, adherence to device use, beneficial effects, activity level and independence, and quality of life. Clinicians were the preferred source for material quality, device modifiability, and joint range of motion. Facility records were the preferred source for timeliness of device delivery and clinician follow-up. Respondents reported that gait speed and walking endurance were best obtained by patient performance. Conclusions: Results provide insight on the topics orthotists and physical therapists regard as priorities for defining healthcare quality for persons using custom ankle-foot orthoses and instruments for data collection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAssistive Technology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Foot Orthoses
Quality of Health Care
Physical Therapists
Ankle
Equipment and Supplies
Advisory Committees
Articular Range of Motion
Walking
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • assessment
  • orthotics
  • outcomes
  • policy and legislation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{c37ce1b2f07f428dafadbd801df5b4db,
title = "Orthotists’ and physical therapists’ perspectives on quality of care indicators for persons with custom ankle-foot orthoses",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe the priorities of orthotists and physical therapists about quality measurement themes, and the feasibility and utility of collecting data from persons using custom AFOs that could inform quality measure development. Materials and Methods: Online survey assessed respondents’ perspectives and experiences. An Advisory Committee representing professional, organizational, and accreditor groups distributed survey invitations. Results: 461 orthotists and 153 physical therapists completed part or all of the survey; 60{\%} rated 9 quality themes and 20 quality of care topics as extremely important, and 12 standard instruments as feasible and good to use for quality measurement. Patients were the preferred source of information for ease of scheduling, device weight, ease of donning and doffing, adherence to device use, beneficial effects, activity level and independence, and quality of life. Clinicians were the preferred source for material quality, device modifiability, and joint range of motion. Facility records were the preferred source for timeliness of device delivery and clinician follow-up. Respondents reported that gait speed and walking endurance were best obtained by patient performance. Conclusions: Results provide insight on the topics orthotists and physical therapists regard as priorities for defining healthcare quality for persons using custom ankle-foot orthoses and instruments for data collection.",
keywords = "assessment, orthotics, outcomes, policy and legislation",
author = "Heinemann, {Allen Walter} and Stefania Fatone and LaVela, {Sherri L} and Slater, {Billie C.S.} and Deutsch, {Anne Frances} and Michelle Peterson and Soltys, {Nicole T.} and Vari McPherson",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10400435.2019.1610814",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Assistive Technology",
issn = "1040-0435",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthotists’ and physical therapists’ perspectives on quality of care indicators for persons with custom ankle-foot orthoses

AU - Heinemann, Allen Walter

AU - Fatone, Stefania

AU - LaVela, Sherri L

AU - Slater, Billie C.S.

AU - Deutsch, Anne Frances

AU - Peterson, Michelle

AU - Soltys, Nicole T.

AU - McPherson, Vari

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To describe the priorities of orthotists and physical therapists about quality measurement themes, and the feasibility and utility of collecting data from persons using custom AFOs that could inform quality measure development. Materials and Methods: Online survey assessed respondents’ perspectives and experiences. An Advisory Committee representing professional, organizational, and accreditor groups distributed survey invitations. Results: 461 orthotists and 153 physical therapists completed part or all of the survey; 60% rated 9 quality themes and 20 quality of care topics as extremely important, and 12 standard instruments as feasible and good to use for quality measurement. Patients were the preferred source of information for ease of scheduling, device weight, ease of donning and doffing, adherence to device use, beneficial effects, activity level and independence, and quality of life. Clinicians were the preferred source for material quality, device modifiability, and joint range of motion. Facility records were the preferred source for timeliness of device delivery and clinician follow-up. Respondents reported that gait speed and walking endurance were best obtained by patient performance. Conclusions: Results provide insight on the topics orthotists and physical therapists regard as priorities for defining healthcare quality for persons using custom ankle-foot orthoses and instruments for data collection.

AB - Purpose: To describe the priorities of orthotists and physical therapists about quality measurement themes, and the feasibility and utility of collecting data from persons using custom AFOs that could inform quality measure development. Materials and Methods: Online survey assessed respondents’ perspectives and experiences. An Advisory Committee representing professional, organizational, and accreditor groups distributed survey invitations. Results: 461 orthotists and 153 physical therapists completed part or all of the survey; 60% rated 9 quality themes and 20 quality of care topics as extremely important, and 12 standard instruments as feasible and good to use for quality measurement. Patients were the preferred source of information for ease of scheduling, device weight, ease of donning and doffing, adherence to device use, beneficial effects, activity level and independence, and quality of life. Clinicians were the preferred source for material quality, device modifiability, and joint range of motion. Facility records were the preferred source for timeliness of device delivery and clinician follow-up. Respondents reported that gait speed and walking endurance were best obtained by patient performance. Conclusions: Results provide insight on the topics orthotists and physical therapists regard as priorities for defining healthcare quality for persons using custom ankle-foot orthoses and instruments for data collection.

KW - assessment

KW - orthotics

KW - outcomes

KW - policy and legislation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065971278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065971278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10400435.2019.1610814

DO - 10.1080/10400435.2019.1610814

M3 - Article

JO - Assistive Technology

JF - Assistive Technology

SN - 1040-0435

ER -