Otolaryngology resident experience with supraclavicular, submental and other regional flaps in the United States

A. T. Day*, L. Tang, Urjeet A Patel, J. D. Richmon, K. S. Emerick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Despite the resurgence in regional flap use, otolaryngology resident regional flap experience has been incompletely studied. We sought to characterize United States (US) otolaryngology resident exposure to, and perceptions of, supraclavicular flaps (SCFs), submental flaps (SMFs), and other regional flaps. Methods: An online survey was disseminated every two weeks to 106 US otolaryngology residency program directors for distribution to residents within their programs between August and October 2016. 121 surveys were returned of which 106 were sufficiently completed and eligible for data analysis. Results: Among residents with adequate responses, 52 were postgraduate year (PGY) 1–3 (junior) residents and 54 were PGY 4–7 (senior) residents. Senior residents participated in more pectoralis major flaps (mean: 8.1, 95%-CI: 6.5–9.8) compared to SCFs (mean: 1.5, 95%-CI: 1.0–2.0, p < 0.001) and SMFs (mean: 0.7; 95%-CI: 0.4–1.0, p < 0.001). Among senior residents exposed to SCFs, SMFs and pectoralis flaps, more individuals judged pectoralis major flaps as successful or very successful (96.2%, 95%-CI: 91.1–100%), compared to SCFs (64.3%, 95%-CI: 46.5–82.0%; p < 0.001) and SMFs (63.2%, 95%-CI: 41.5–84.8%; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Senior otolaryngology residents were exposed to fewer SCFs and SMFs compared to pectoralis major flaps. Resident perception that SCFs and SMFs were not as successful as pectoralis major flaps should be investigated further.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)518-521
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Otolaryngology
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{9f6d8333d6484a268dbc2ac8574ec894,
title = "Otolaryngology resident experience with supraclavicular, submental and other regional flaps in the United States",
abstract = "Objective: Despite the resurgence in regional flap use, otolaryngology resident regional flap experience has been incompletely studied. We sought to characterize United States (US) otolaryngology resident exposure to, and perceptions of, supraclavicular flaps (SCFs), submental flaps (SMFs), and other regional flaps. Methods: An online survey was disseminated every two weeks to 106 US otolaryngology residency program directors for distribution to residents within their programs between August and October 2016. 121 surveys were returned of which 106 were sufficiently completed and eligible for data analysis. Results: Among residents with adequate responses, 52 were postgraduate year (PGY) 1–3 (junior) residents and 54 were PGY 4–7 (senior) residents. Senior residents participated in more pectoralis major flaps (mean: 8.1, 95{\%}-CI: 6.5–9.8) compared to SCFs (mean: 1.5, 95{\%}-CI: 1.0–2.0, p < 0.001) and SMFs (mean: 0.7; 95{\%}-CI: 0.4–1.0, p < 0.001). Among senior residents exposed to SCFs, SMFs and pectoralis flaps, more individuals judged pectoralis major flaps as successful or very successful (96.2{\%}, 95{\%}-CI: 91.1–100{\%}), compared to SCFs (64.3{\%}, 95{\%}-CI: 46.5–82.0{\%}; p < 0.001) and SMFs (63.2{\%}, 95{\%}-CI: 41.5–84.8{\%}; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Senior otolaryngology residents were exposed to fewer SCFs and SMFs compared to pectoralis major flaps. Resident perception that SCFs and SMFs were not as successful as pectoralis major flaps should be investigated further.",
author = "Day, {A. T.} and L. Tang and Patel, {Urjeet A} and Richmon, {J. D.} and Emerick, {K. S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.05.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "518--521",
journal = "American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery",
issn = "0196-0709",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Otolaryngology resident experience with supraclavicular, submental and other regional flaps in the United States. / Day, A. T.; Tang, L.; Patel, Urjeet A; Richmon, J. D.; Emerick, K. S.

In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. 518-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Otolaryngology resident experience with supraclavicular, submental and other regional flaps in the United States

AU - Day, A. T.

AU - Tang, L.

AU - Patel, Urjeet A

AU - Richmon, J. D.

AU - Emerick, K. S.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Objective: Despite the resurgence in regional flap use, otolaryngology resident regional flap experience has been incompletely studied. We sought to characterize United States (US) otolaryngology resident exposure to, and perceptions of, supraclavicular flaps (SCFs), submental flaps (SMFs), and other regional flaps. Methods: An online survey was disseminated every two weeks to 106 US otolaryngology residency program directors for distribution to residents within their programs between August and October 2016. 121 surveys were returned of which 106 were sufficiently completed and eligible for data analysis. Results: Among residents with adequate responses, 52 were postgraduate year (PGY) 1–3 (junior) residents and 54 were PGY 4–7 (senior) residents. Senior residents participated in more pectoralis major flaps (mean: 8.1, 95%-CI: 6.5–9.8) compared to SCFs (mean: 1.5, 95%-CI: 1.0–2.0, p < 0.001) and SMFs (mean: 0.7; 95%-CI: 0.4–1.0, p < 0.001). Among senior residents exposed to SCFs, SMFs and pectoralis flaps, more individuals judged pectoralis major flaps as successful or very successful (96.2%, 95%-CI: 91.1–100%), compared to SCFs (64.3%, 95%-CI: 46.5–82.0%; p < 0.001) and SMFs (63.2%, 95%-CI: 41.5–84.8%; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Senior otolaryngology residents were exposed to fewer SCFs and SMFs compared to pectoralis major flaps. Resident perception that SCFs and SMFs were not as successful as pectoralis major flaps should be investigated further.

AB - Objective: Despite the resurgence in regional flap use, otolaryngology resident regional flap experience has been incompletely studied. We sought to characterize United States (US) otolaryngology resident exposure to, and perceptions of, supraclavicular flaps (SCFs), submental flaps (SMFs), and other regional flaps. Methods: An online survey was disseminated every two weeks to 106 US otolaryngology residency program directors for distribution to residents within their programs between August and October 2016. 121 surveys were returned of which 106 were sufficiently completed and eligible for data analysis. Results: Among residents with adequate responses, 52 were postgraduate year (PGY) 1–3 (junior) residents and 54 were PGY 4–7 (senior) residents. Senior residents participated in more pectoralis major flaps (mean: 8.1, 95%-CI: 6.5–9.8) compared to SCFs (mean: 1.5, 95%-CI: 1.0–2.0, p < 0.001) and SMFs (mean: 0.7; 95%-CI: 0.4–1.0, p < 0.001). Among senior residents exposed to SCFs, SMFs and pectoralis flaps, more individuals judged pectoralis major flaps as successful or very successful (96.2%, 95%-CI: 91.1–100%), compared to SCFs (64.3%, 95%-CI: 46.5–82.0%; p < 0.001) and SMFs (63.2%, 95%-CI: 41.5–84.8%; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Senior otolaryngology residents were exposed to fewer SCFs and SMFs compared to pectoralis major flaps. Resident perception that SCFs and SMFs were not as successful as pectoralis major flaps should be investigated further.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048570575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048570575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.05.016

DO - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.05.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 29884566

AN - SCOPUS:85048570575

VL - 39

SP - 518

EP - 521

JO - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

JF - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

SN - 0196-0709

IS - 5

ER -