Abstract
Objectives We aimed to identify existing outcome measures for functional neurological disorder (FND), to inform the development of recommendations and to guide future research on FND outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify existing FND-specific outcome measures and the most common measurement domains and measures in previous treatment studies. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were conducted between January 1965 and June 2019. The findings were discussed during two international meetings of the FND-Core Outcome Measures group. Results Five FND-specific measures were identified - three clinician-rated and two patient-rated - but their measurement properties have not been rigorously evaluated. No single measure was identified for use across the range of FND symptoms in adults. Across randomised controlled trials (k=40) and observational treatment studies (k=40), outcome measures most often assessed core FND symptom change. Other domains measured commonly were additional physical and psychological symptoms, life impact (ie, quality of life, disability and general functioning) and health economics/cost-utility (eg, healthcare resource use and quality-adjusted life years). Conclusions There are few well-validated FND-specific outcome measures. Thus, at present, we recommend that existing outcome measures, known to be reliable, valid and responsive in FND or closely related populations, are used to capture key outcome domains. Increased consistency in outcome measurement will facilitate comparison of treatment effects across FND symptom types and treatment modalities. Future work needs to more rigorously validate outcome measures used in this population.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 638-649 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry |
Volume | 91 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1 2020 |
Keywords
- clinical neurology
- conversion disorder
- functional neurological disorder
- movement disorders
- neuropsychiatry
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Surgery
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: A systematic review and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder : A systematic review and recommendations. / Pick, Susannah; Anderson, David G.; Asadi-Pooya, Ali A. et al.
In: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Vol. 91, No. 6, 01.06.2020, p. 638-649.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder
T2 - A systematic review and recommendations
AU - Pick, Susannah
AU - Anderson, David G.
AU - Asadi-Pooya, Ali A.
AU - Aybek, Selma
AU - Baslet, Gaston
AU - Bloem, Bastiaan R.
AU - Nicholson, Timothy R.
AU - Brown, Richard J.
AU - Carson, Alan J.
AU - Chalder, Trudie
AU - Damianova, Maria
AU - David, Anthony S.
AU - Edwards, Mark J.
AU - Epstein, Steven A.
AU - Espay, Alberto J.
AU - Garcin, Béatrice
AU - Goldstein, Laura H.
AU - Hallett, Mark
AU - Jankovic, Joseph
AU - Joyce, Eileen M.
AU - Kanaan, Richard A.
AU - Keynejad, Roxanne C.
AU - Kozlowska, Kasia
AU - Lafaver, Kathrin
AU - Curt Lafrance, W.
AU - Lang, Anthony E.
AU - Lehn, Alex
AU - Lidstone, Sarah
AU - Maurer, Carine W.
AU - Mildon, Bridget
AU - Morgante, Francesca
AU - Myers, Lorna
AU - Nicholson, Clare
AU - Nielsen, Glenn
AU - Perez, David L.
AU - Popkirov, Stoyan
AU - Reuber, Markus
AU - Rommelfanger, Karen S.
AU - Schwingenshuh, Petra
AU - Serranova, Tereza
AU - Shotbolt, Paul
AU - Stebbins, Glenn T.
AU - Stone, Jon
AU - Tijssen, Marina A.J.
AU - Tinazzi, Michele
N1 - Funding Information: Bastiaan R Bloem @basbloem, Alan J Carson @AlanCarson15, Anthony S David @ProfTonyDavid, Mark J edwards @drmarkedwards, Alberto J espay @ Albertoespay, Béatrice Garcin @beagarcin1, Mark Hallett @MarkHallett007, Joseph Jankovic @JankovicJoseph, Roxanne C Keynejad @RoxanneKeynejad, Kathrin LaFaver @LaFaverMD, Sarah Lidstone @SarahLidstone, Bridget Mildon @ FNDHopeinternational, Francesca Morgante @franci_morgante, Lorna Myers @ dramyers1, Clare Nicholson @CNicholsonOT, Glenn Nielsen @GNielsen_Physio, David L Perez @PerezMGHLab, Stoyan Popkirov @popkirov, Markus Reuber @ MarkusReuber, Paul Shotbolt @Paul_Shotbolt, Jon Stone @jonstoneneuro and Timothy R Nicholson @Tim_R_Nicholson Contributors TRN and SPi formulated the idea for the review; TRN, SPi and AJC planned the overall structure, with input from the Functional Neurological Disorder–Core Outcome Measures (FND-COM) group. SPi conducted the literature reviews, extracted the data, prepared the tables/figures and wrote the manuscript (including revised versions). TRN contributed to the tables in supplementary files 3 and 4. ABw, TRN, RCK and SPo independently screened a subset of titles/abstracts during the literature review. All other authors contributed to the FND-COM meetings or discussions in person, by email or teleconference. All authors reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content and/or suggested revisions. Funding AJe received grant support from the National institutes of Health (NiH) and the Michael J Fox Foundation. LHG reported salary support from the UK National institute for Health Research (NiHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. TRN and SPi were also funded by an NiHR clinician scientist fellowship. GN also received funding from the NiHR. RCK received an NiHR Academic Clinical Fellowship in General Adult Psychiatry and a Royal College of Psychiatrists Gosling Fellowship. She also received PhD funding from King’s College London and a King’s institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (ioPPN) Clinician investigator Scholarship. MH was supported by the National institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke intramural Programme (NiH, USA). TS received support from Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (grant number AZv ČR 16-29651). Funding Information: disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS (UK), the National institute for Health Research (UK), the Department of Health and Social Care (UK) or the National institutes of Health/National institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (USA). Competing interests AAA-P reports honoraria from Cobel Daruo, Sanofi and RaymandRad, and royalty from Oxford University Press (book publication). AJC reports independent expert testimony work for personal injury and medical negligence claims, is a paid associate editor of JNNP and runs a free non-profit self-help website (www.headinjurysymptoms.org). AJe has received personal compensation as a consultant/scientific advisory board member for Abbvie, Adamas, Acadia, Acorda, Neuroderm, impax/Amneal, Sunovion, Lundbeck, Osmotica Pharmaceutical and US worldMeds; publishing royalties from Lippincott williams & wilkins, Cambridge University Press and Springer; and honoraria from US worldMeds, Lundbeck, Acadia, Sunovion, the American Academy of Neurology and the Movement Disorders Society. BM has received honoraria from The Cleveland Clinic and runs a free non-profit self-help website (www.fndhope.org). wCLF has served on the editorial boards of Epilepsia, Epilepsy & Behavior; Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry and Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences; receives editor’s royalties from the publication of Gates and Rowan’s Nonepileptic Seizures, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2010) and 4th ed. (2018); author’s royalties for Taking Control of Your Seizures: Workbook and Therapist Guide (Oxford University Press, 2015); has received research support from the Department of Defense (DoD w81XwH-17-0169), National institutes of Health (NiH) (NiNDS 5K23NS45902 [Pi]), Providence vAMC, Center for Neurorestoration and Neurorehabilitation, Rhode island Hospital, the American epilepsy Society (AeS), the epilepsy Foundation (eF), Brown University and the Siravo Foundation; serves on the epilepsy Foundation New england Professional Advisory Board; received honoraria for the American Academy of Neurology Meeting Annual Course; served as a clinic development consultant at University of Colorado Denver, Cleveland Clinic, Spectrum Health, emory University and Oregon Health Sciences University; and provided medicolegal expert testimony. DLP has received honoraria from the American Academy of Neurology, Movement Disorder Society and Harvard Medical School. JS reports independent expert testimony work for personal injury and medical negligence claims, receives royalties from UpToDate for articles on functional neurological disorder and runs a free non-profit self-help website (www. neurosymptoms.org). KLF has received honoraria from the American Academy of Neurology and the Movement Disorder Society. MH may accrue revenue on a US patent for an immunotoxin (MAB-Ricin) for the treatment of focal movement disorders and for a coil for magnetic stimulation and methods for using the same (H-coil); in relation to the latter, he has received licence fee payments from the NiH (from Brainsway). He is on the medical advisory boards of CALA Health, Brainsway and Cadent. He is on the editorial board of approximately 15 journals and receives royalties and/or honoraria from publishing from Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Springer and elsevier. Grant research funds have come from Merz for treatment studies of focal hand dystonia; Allergan for studies of methods to inject botulinum toxins; Medtronic, inc. for a study of DBS for dystonia; and CALA Health for studies of a device to suppress tremor. MJe reports independent expert testimony work for personal injury and medical negligence claims and receives royalties from the Oxford Specialist Handbook of Parkinson’s Disease and Other Movement Disorders. He has received honoraria from Merz Pharma and Boeringher ingleheim. AeL reports consultancy support from Abbvie, AFFiRis, Biogen, Janssen, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Paladin, Roche, Sun Pharma, Theravance, and Corticobasal Degeneration Solutions; advisory board support form Jazz Pharma, PhotoPharmics, Sunovion; other honoraria from Sun Pharma, Abbvie, Sunovion, American Academy of Neurology and the international Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society; grants from Brain Canada, Canadian institutes of Health Research, Corticobasal Degeneration Solutions, edmond J Safra Philanthropic Foundation, Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Ontario Brain institute, Parkinson Foundation, Parkinson Canada, and w. Garfield weston Foundation and royalties from elsevier, Saunders, wiley-Blackwell, Johns Hopkins Press, and Cambridge University Press. Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Objectives We aimed to identify existing outcome measures for functional neurological disorder (FND), to inform the development of recommendations and to guide future research on FND outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify existing FND-specific outcome measures and the most common measurement domains and measures in previous treatment studies. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were conducted between January 1965 and June 2019. The findings were discussed during two international meetings of the FND-Core Outcome Measures group. Results Five FND-specific measures were identified - three clinician-rated and two patient-rated - but their measurement properties have not been rigorously evaluated. No single measure was identified for use across the range of FND symptoms in adults. Across randomised controlled trials (k=40) and observational treatment studies (k=40), outcome measures most often assessed core FND symptom change. Other domains measured commonly were additional physical and psychological symptoms, life impact (ie, quality of life, disability and general functioning) and health economics/cost-utility (eg, healthcare resource use and quality-adjusted life years). Conclusions There are few well-validated FND-specific outcome measures. Thus, at present, we recommend that existing outcome measures, known to be reliable, valid and responsive in FND or closely related populations, are used to capture key outcome domains. Increased consistency in outcome measurement will facilitate comparison of treatment effects across FND symptom types and treatment modalities. Future work needs to more rigorously validate outcome measures used in this population.
AB - Objectives We aimed to identify existing outcome measures for functional neurological disorder (FND), to inform the development of recommendations and to guide future research on FND outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify existing FND-specific outcome measures and the most common measurement domains and measures in previous treatment studies. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were conducted between January 1965 and June 2019. The findings were discussed during two international meetings of the FND-Core Outcome Measures group. Results Five FND-specific measures were identified - three clinician-rated and two patient-rated - but their measurement properties have not been rigorously evaluated. No single measure was identified for use across the range of FND symptoms in adults. Across randomised controlled trials (k=40) and observational treatment studies (k=40), outcome measures most often assessed core FND symptom change. Other domains measured commonly were additional physical and psychological symptoms, life impact (ie, quality of life, disability and general functioning) and health economics/cost-utility (eg, healthcare resource use and quality-adjusted life years). Conclusions There are few well-validated FND-specific outcome measures. Thus, at present, we recommend that existing outcome measures, known to be reliable, valid and responsive in FND or closely related populations, are used to capture key outcome domains. Increased consistency in outcome measurement will facilitate comparison of treatment effects across FND symptom types and treatment modalities. Future work needs to more rigorously validate outcome measures used in this population.
KW - clinical neurology
KW - conversion disorder
KW - functional neurological disorder
KW - movement disorders
KW - neuropsychiatry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081699833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081699833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322180
DO - 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322180
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32111637
AN - SCOPUS:85081699833
SN - 0022-3050
VL - 91
SP - 638
EP - 649
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -