Outcomes in oncologic surgery: Does volume make a difference?

David J. Bentrem, Murray F. Brennan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Commonly performed elective surgical procedures on the alimentary tract are carried out with low morbidity and low mortality in most hospitals in the United States. There are some procedures on the alimentary tract that are performed with a relatively low frequency and are associated with higher mortality. Volume is a surrogate marker associated with improved outcome, with relative differences being dependent on the complexity of the procedure and the frequency with which it is done. Both surgeon and institutional volume matters, but it seems that improved operative mortality can be reached with lower surgeon volume in high-volume institutions. It appears that volume can be substituted in part for by specialization and training, with improved outcomes based on specialist credentials and fellowship training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1210-1216
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes in oncologic surgery: Does volume make a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this