Outputs: the promises and perils of ethnographic engagement after the loss of faith in transnational dialogue

Annelise Riles*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This essay investigates one important artefact of meeting knowledge production: outputs. It does so through the example of the activities of the members of Meridian 180, a community of Pacific Rim intellectuals collaborating on transnational legal and policy issues. For the members, the particular kind of knowledge production facilitated by Meridian 180 constitutes a response to the failures of international bureaucracy to generate and sustain a fabric of global relationality. The group's various attempts to address the imperative for ‘output’ illuminate both aspects of the meeting as an organizational form, and the challenges and opportunities meetings present for ethnography. The wider underlying theme of the essay concerns the ethical purposes and promises of ethnographic styles of engagement after the loss of faith in transnational dialogue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-197
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Volume23
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Outputs: the promises and perils of ethnographic engagement after the loss of faith in transnational dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this