TY - JOUR
T1 - Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure
T2 - Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey
AU - Chuzi, SARAH
AU - PENSA, ANTHONY V.
AU - ALLEN, LARRY A.
AU - CROSS, SARAH H.
AU - FEDER, SHELLI L.
AU - WARRAICH, HAIDER J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the Heart Failure Society of America for supporting this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background: Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians’ perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. Methods and Results: A 36-item survey was sent to 2109 members of the Heart Failure Society of America. Eighty respondents (53% physicians), including 51 respondents from at least 42 medical centers, completed the survey, with the majority practicing in urban (76%) academic medical centers (62%) that implanted LVADs (81%). Among the 42 unique medical centers identified, respondents reported both independent (40%) and integrated (40%) outpatient PC clinic models, whereas 12% reported not having outpatient PC at their institutions. A minority (12%) reported that their institution used triggered PC referrals based on objective clinical data. Of respondents from LVAD sites, the majority reported that a clinician from the PC team was required to see all patients prior to implantation, but there was variability in practices. Among all respondents, the most common reasons for PC referral in HF were poor prognosis, consideration of advanced cardiac therapies or other high-risk procedures and advance-care planning or goals-of-care discussions. The most frequent perceived barriers to PC consultation included lack of PC clinicians, unpredictable HF clinical trajectories and limited understanding of how PC can complement traditional HF care. Conclusion: PC integration and clinician perceptions of services vary in HF care. More research and guidance regarding evidence-based models of PC delivery in HF are needed.
AB - Background: Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians’ perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. Methods and Results: A 36-item survey was sent to 2109 members of the Heart Failure Society of America. Eighty respondents (53% physicians), including 51 respondents from at least 42 medical centers, completed the survey, with the majority practicing in urban (76%) academic medical centers (62%) that implanted LVADs (81%). Among the 42 unique medical centers identified, respondents reported both independent (40%) and integrated (40%) outpatient PC clinic models, whereas 12% reported not having outpatient PC at their institutions. A minority (12%) reported that their institution used triggered PC referrals based on objective clinical data. Of respondents from LVAD sites, the majority reported that a clinician from the PC team was required to see all patients prior to implantation, but there was variability in practices. Among all respondents, the most common reasons for PC referral in HF were poor prognosis, consideration of advanced cardiac therapies or other high-risk procedures and advance-care planning or goals-of-care discussions. The most frequent perceived barriers to PC consultation included lack of PC clinicians, unpredictable HF clinical trajectories and limited understanding of how PC can complement traditional HF care. Conclusion: PC integration and clinician perceptions of services vary in HF care. More research and guidance regarding evidence-based models of PC delivery in HF are needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145994484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85145994484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.010
DO - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 35842103
AN - SCOPUS:85145994484
SN - 1071-9164
VL - 29
SP - 112
EP - 115
JO - Journal of Cardiac Failure
JF - Journal of Cardiac Failure
IS - 1
ER -