TY - JOUR
T1 - Parallel distributed networks resolved at high resolution reveal close juxtaposition of distinct regions
AU - Braga, Rodrigo M.
AU - Van Dijk, Koene R.A.
AU - Polimeni, Jonathan R.
AU - Eldaief, Mark C.
AU - Buckner, Randy L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Harvard Center for Brain Science neuroimaging core and FAS Division of Research Computing for support. L. DiNicola assisted with data processing. A. Youssoufian, H. Becker, E. Phlegar, and M. K. Drews assisted in data acquisition. B. T. T. Yeo and P. Angeli assisted with the projection of MNI coordinates to the cortical surface. H. Hoke, T. O’Keefe, R. Mair, and S. McMains assisted with data processing optimization. B. Keil assisted with the use of the custom 7T head coil. The marmoset tract tracing data come from the Marmoset Brain Architecture Project (http://www.marmosetbrain.org) as analyzed in Buckner and Margulies (in press). The UK Biobank data come from the openly available data as provided by the 3D-maps browser of the UK Biobank Brain Imaging Online Resources (https://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/ukbiobank). The multiband echo-planar imaging sequence was generously provided by the Center for Magnetic Resonance Research at the University of Minnesota. R. M. Braga was supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 103980/Z/14/Z and NIH Pathway to Independence Award K99MH117226. M. C. Eldaief was supported by Mentored Patient-Oriented Career Development Award K23MH099413. This work was also supported by Kent and Liz Dauten, NIH Grants P50MH106435 and P41EB015896, and Shared Instrumentation Grants S10OD020039 and S10RR019371.
Funding Information:
R. M. Braga was supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 103980/Z/14/Z and NIH Pathway to Independence Award K99MH117226. M. C. Eldaief was supported by Mentored Patient-Oriented Career Development Award K23MH099413. This work was also supported by Kent and Liz Dauten, NIH Grants P50MH106435 and P41EB015896, and Shared Instrumentation Grants S10OD020039 and S10RR019371.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 the American Physiological Society.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Examination of large-scale distributed networks within the individual reveals details of cortical network organization that are absent in group-averaged studies. One recent discovery is that a distributed transmodal network, often referred to as the “default network,” comprises two closely interdigitated networks, only one of which is coupled to posterior parahippocampal cortex. Not all studies of individuals have identified the same networks, and questions remain about the degree to which the two networks are separate, particularly within regions hypothesized to be interconnected hubs. In this study we replicate the observation of network separation across analytical (seed-based connectivity and parcellation) and data projection (volume and surface) methods in two individuals each scanned 31 times. Additionally, three individuals were examined with highresolution (7T; 1.35 mm) functional magnetic resonance imaging to gain further insight into the anatomical details. The two networks were identified with separate regions localized to adjacent portions of the cortical ribbon, sometimes inside the same sulcus. Midline regions previously implicated as hubs revealed near complete spatial separation of the two networks, displaying a complex spatial topography in the posterior cingulate and precuneus. The network coupled to parahippocampal cortex also revealed a separate region directly within the hippocampus, at or near the subiculum. These collective results support that the default network is composed of at least two spatially juxtaposed networks. Fine spatial details and juxtapositions of the two networks can be identified within individuals at high resolution, providing insight into the network organization of association cortex and placing further constraints on interpretation of group-averaged neuroimaging data. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent evidence has emerged that canonical large-scale networks such as the “default network” fractionate into parallel distributed networks when defined within individuals. This research uses high-resolution imaging to show that the networks possess juxtapositions sometimes evident inside the same sulcus and within regions that have been previously hypothesized to be network hubs. Distinct circumscribed regions of one network were also resolved in the hippocampal formation, at or near the parahippocampal cortex and subiculum.
AB - Examination of large-scale distributed networks within the individual reveals details of cortical network organization that are absent in group-averaged studies. One recent discovery is that a distributed transmodal network, often referred to as the “default network,” comprises two closely interdigitated networks, only one of which is coupled to posterior parahippocampal cortex. Not all studies of individuals have identified the same networks, and questions remain about the degree to which the two networks are separate, particularly within regions hypothesized to be interconnected hubs. In this study we replicate the observation of network separation across analytical (seed-based connectivity and parcellation) and data projection (volume and surface) methods in two individuals each scanned 31 times. Additionally, three individuals were examined with highresolution (7T; 1.35 mm) functional magnetic resonance imaging to gain further insight into the anatomical details. The two networks were identified with separate regions localized to adjacent portions of the cortical ribbon, sometimes inside the same sulcus. Midline regions previously implicated as hubs revealed near complete spatial separation of the two networks, displaying a complex spatial topography in the posterior cingulate and precuneus. The network coupled to parahippocampal cortex also revealed a separate region directly within the hippocampus, at or near the subiculum. These collective results support that the default network is composed of at least two spatially juxtaposed networks. Fine spatial details and juxtapositions of the two networks can be identified within individuals at high resolution, providing insight into the network organization of association cortex and placing further constraints on interpretation of group-averaged neuroimaging data. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent evidence has emerged that canonical large-scale networks such as the “default network” fractionate into parallel distributed networks when defined within individuals. This research uses high-resolution imaging to show that the networks possess juxtapositions sometimes evident inside the same sulcus and within regions that have been previously hypothesized to be network hubs. Distinct circumscribed regions of one network were also resolved in the hippocampal formation, at or near the parahippocampal cortex and subiculum.
KW - Association cortex
KW - Default network
KW - Hippocampus
KW - Subiculum
KW - Uk biobank
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064961098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064961098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jn.00808.2018
DO - 10.1152/jn.00808.2018
M3 - Article
C2 - 30785825
AN - SCOPUS:85064961098
SN - 0022-3077
VL - 121
SP - 1513
EP - 1534
JO - Journal of neurophysiology
JF - Journal of neurophysiology
IS - 4
ER -