Parallel functional category deficits in clauses and nominal phrases

The case of English agrammatism

Honglei Wang*, Masaya Yoshida, Cynthia K Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individuals with agrammatic aphasia exhibit restricted patterns of impairment of functional morphemes, however, syntactic characterization of the impairment is controversial. Previous studies have focused on functional morphology in clauses only. This study extends the empirical domain by testing functional morphemes in English nominal phrases in aphasia and comparing patients' impairment to their impairment of functional morphemes in English clauses. In the linguistics literature, it is assumed that clauses and nominal phrases are structurally parallel but exhibit inflectional differences. The results of the present study indicated that aphasic speakers evinced similar impairment patterns in clauses and nominal phrases. These findings are consistent with the Distributed Morphology Hypothesis (DMH), suggesting that the source of functional morphology deficits among agrammatics relates to difficulty implementing rules that convert inflectional features into morphemes. Our findings, however, are inconsistent with the Tree Pruning Hypothesis (TPH), which suggests that patients have difficulty building complex hierarchical structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-102
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Neurolinguistics
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Broca Aphasia
Aphasia
deficit
speech disorder
Linguistics
linguistics
Nominal Phrases
Clause
Impairment
Agrammatism
Functional Categories
Morpheme

Keywords

  • Agrammatic aphasia
  • Clause
  • Functional category
  • Nominal phrase

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{f95c04249d4e4a16bc332c62c664899f,
title = "Parallel functional category deficits in clauses and nominal phrases: The case of English agrammatism",
abstract = "Individuals with agrammatic aphasia exhibit restricted patterns of impairment of functional morphemes, however, syntactic characterization of the impairment is controversial. Previous studies have focused on functional morphology in clauses only. This study extends the empirical domain by testing functional morphemes in English nominal phrases in aphasia and comparing patients' impairment to their impairment of functional morphemes in English clauses. In the linguistics literature, it is assumed that clauses and nominal phrases are structurally parallel but exhibit inflectional differences. The results of the present study indicated that aphasic speakers evinced similar impairment patterns in clauses and nominal phrases. These findings are consistent with the Distributed Morphology Hypothesis (DMH), suggesting that the source of functional morphology deficits among agrammatics relates to difficulty implementing rules that convert inflectional features into morphemes. Our findings, however, are inconsistent with the Tree Pruning Hypothesis (TPH), which suggests that patients have difficulty building complex hierarchical structures.",
keywords = "Agrammatic aphasia, Clause, Functional category, Nominal phrase",
author = "Honglei Wang and Masaya Yoshida and Thompson, {Cynthia K}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "75--102",
journal = "Journal of Neurolinguistics",
issn = "0911-6044",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Parallel functional category deficits in clauses and nominal phrases : The case of English agrammatism. / Wang, Honglei; Yoshida, Masaya; Thompson, Cynthia K.

In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 75-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parallel functional category deficits in clauses and nominal phrases

T2 - The case of English agrammatism

AU - Wang, Honglei

AU - Yoshida, Masaya

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Individuals with agrammatic aphasia exhibit restricted patterns of impairment of functional morphemes, however, syntactic characterization of the impairment is controversial. Previous studies have focused on functional morphology in clauses only. This study extends the empirical domain by testing functional morphemes in English nominal phrases in aphasia and comparing patients' impairment to their impairment of functional morphemes in English clauses. In the linguistics literature, it is assumed that clauses and nominal phrases are structurally parallel but exhibit inflectional differences. The results of the present study indicated that aphasic speakers evinced similar impairment patterns in clauses and nominal phrases. These findings are consistent with the Distributed Morphology Hypothesis (DMH), suggesting that the source of functional morphology deficits among agrammatics relates to difficulty implementing rules that convert inflectional features into morphemes. Our findings, however, are inconsistent with the Tree Pruning Hypothesis (TPH), which suggests that patients have difficulty building complex hierarchical structures.

AB - Individuals with agrammatic aphasia exhibit restricted patterns of impairment of functional morphemes, however, syntactic characterization of the impairment is controversial. Previous studies have focused on functional morphology in clauses only. This study extends the empirical domain by testing functional morphemes in English nominal phrases in aphasia and comparing patients' impairment to their impairment of functional morphemes in English clauses. In the linguistics literature, it is assumed that clauses and nominal phrases are structurally parallel but exhibit inflectional differences. The results of the present study indicated that aphasic speakers evinced similar impairment patterns in clauses and nominal phrases. These findings are consistent with the Distributed Morphology Hypothesis (DMH), suggesting that the source of functional morphology deficits among agrammatics relates to difficulty implementing rules that convert inflectional features into morphemes. Our findings, however, are inconsistent with the Tree Pruning Hypothesis (TPH), which suggests that patients have difficulty building complex hierarchical structures.

KW - Agrammatic aphasia

KW - Clause

KW - Functional category

KW - Nominal phrase

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886772004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886772004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 75

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics

JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics

SN - 0911-6044

IS - 1

ER -