Parent Preferences and Perceptions of Milliliters and Teaspoons

Role of Health Literacy and Experience

Alejandro Torres, Ruth M. Parker, Lee M. Sanders, Michael S. Wolf, Stacy Cooper Bailey, Deesha A. Patel, Jessica J. Jimenez, Kwang Youn A. Kim, Benard P. Dreyer, Alan L. Mendelsohn, H. Shonna Yin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives A recent American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement recommends milliliter-exclusive dosing for pediatric liquid medications. Little is known about parent preferences regarding units, perceptions about moving to milliliters only, and the role of health literacy and prior milliliter-dosing experience. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of data collected as part of a randomized controlled study in 3 urban pediatric clinics (SAFE Rx for Kids study). English- and Spanish-speaking parents (n = 493) of children aged ≤8 years were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms and given labels and dosing tools which varied in label instruction format (text plus pictogram, text only) and units (milliliter only [“mL”], milliliter/teaspoon [“mL”/“tsp”]). Outcomes included teaspoon preference in dosing instructions and perceived difficulty with milliliter-only dosing. The predictor variable was health literacy (Newest Vital Sign; low [0–1], marginal [2–3], adequate [4–6]). The mediating variable was prior milliliter-dosing experience. Results Over two-thirds of parents had low or marginal health literacy. The majority (>70%) preferred to use milliliters, perceived milliliter-only dosing to be easy, and had prior milliliter-dosing experience; 11.5% had a teaspoon preference, 18.1% perceived milliliter-only dosing will be difficult, and 17.7% had no prior milliliter-dosing experience. Parents with lower health literacy had a higher odds of having a teaspoon preference (low vs adequate: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.9 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–6.2]), and greater odds of perceiving difficulty with milliliter-only dosing (low vs adequate: AOR = 13.9 [95% CI 4.8–40.6], marginal vs adequate: AOR = 7.1 [95% CI 2.5–20.4]). Lack of experience with milliliter dosing partially mediated the impact of health literacy. Conclusions Most parents were comfortable with milliliter-only dosing. Parents with low health literacy were more likely to perceive milliliter-only dosing to be difficult; educational efforts will need to target this group to ensure safe medication use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-34
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Parents
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Pediatrics
Vital Signs
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • ambulatory care
  • dosing errors
  • dosing units
  • health communication
  • health literacy
  • medication errors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Torres, Alejandro ; Parker, Ruth M. ; Sanders, Lee M. ; Wolf, Michael S. ; Bailey, Stacy Cooper ; Patel, Deesha A. ; Jimenez, Jessica J. ; Kim, Kwang Youn A. ; Dreyer, Benard P. ; Mendelsohn, Alan L. ; Yin, H. Shonna. / Parent Preferences and Perceptions of Milliliters and Teaspoons : Role of Health Literacy and Experience. In: Academic Pediatrics. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 26-34.
@article{569b28add2624c189208c71be6b38a3d,
title = "Parent Preferences and Perceptions of Milliliters and Teaspoons: Role of Health Literacy and Experience",
abstract = "Background and Objectives A recent American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement recommends milliliter-exclusive dosing for pediatric liquid medications. Little is known about parent preferences regarding units, perceptions about moving to milliliters only, and the role of health literacy and prior milliliter-dosing experience. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of data collected as part of a randomized controlled study in 3 urban pediatric clinics (SAFE Rx for Kids study). English- and Spanish-speaking parents (n = 493) of children aged ≤8 years were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms and given labels and dosing tools which varied in label instruction format (text plus pictogram, text only) and units (milliliter only [“mL”], milliliter/teaspoon [“mL”/“tsp”]). Outcomes included teaspoon preference in dosing instructions and perceived difficulty with milliliter-only dosing. The predictor variable was health literacy (Newest Vital Sign; low [0–1], marginal [2–3], adequate [4–6]). The mediating variable was prior milliliter-dosing experience. Results Over two-thirds of parents had low or marginal health literacy. The majority (>70{\%}) preferred to use milliliters, perceived milliliter-only dosing to be easy, and had prior milliliter-dosing experience; 11.5{\%} had a teaspoon preference, 18.1{\%} perceived milliliter-only dosing will be difficult, and 17.7{\%} had no prior milliliter-dosing experience. Parents with lower health literacy had a higher odds of having a teaspoon preference (low vs adequate: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.9 [95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.3–6.2]), and greater odds of perceiving difficulty with milliliter-only dosing (low vs adequate: AOR = 13.9 [95{\%} CI 4.8–40.6], marginal vs adequate: AOR = 7.1 [95{\%} CI 2.5–20.4]). Lack of experience with milliliter dosing partially mediated the impact of health literacy. Conclusions Most parents were comfortable with milliliter-only dosing. Parents with low health literacy were more likely to perceive milliliter-only dosing to be difficult; educational efforts will need to target this group to ensure safe medication use.",
keywords = "ambulatory care, dosing errors, dosing units, health communication, health literacy, medication errors",
author = "Alejandro Torres and Parker, {Ruth M.} and Sanders, {Lee M.} and Wolf, {Michael S.} and Bailey, {Stacy Cooper} and Patel, {Deesha A.} and Jimenez, {Jessica J.} and Kim, {Kwang Youn A.} and Dreyer, {Benard P.} and Mendelsohn, {Alan L.} and Yin, {H. Shonna}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "26--34",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Torres, A, Parker, RM, Sanders, LM, Wolf, MS, Bailey, SC, Patel, DA, Jimenez, JJ, Kim, KYA, Dreyer, BP, Mendelsohn, AL & Yin, HS 2018, 'Parent Preferences and Perceptions of Milliliters and Teaspoons: Role of Health Literacy and Experience', Academic Pediatrics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.001

Parent Preferences and Perceptions of Milliliters and Teaspoons : Role of Health Literacy and Experience. / Torres, Alejandro; Parker, Ruth M.; Sanders, Lee M.; Wolf, Michael S.; Bailey, Stacy Cooper; Patel, Deesha A.; Jimenez, Jessica J.; Kim, Kwang Youn A.; Dreyer, Benard P.; Mendelsohn, Alan L.; Yin, H. Shonna.

In: Academic Pediatrics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 26-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parent Preferences and Perceptions of Milliliters and Teaspoons

T2 - Role of Health Literacy and Experience

AU - Torres, Alejandro

AU - Parker, Ruth M.

AU - Sanders, Lee M.

AU - Wolf, Michael S.

AU - Bailey, Stacy Cooper

AU - Patel, Deesha A.

AU - Jimenez, Jessica J.

AU - Kim, Kwang Youn A.

AU - Dreyer, Benard P.

AU - Mendelsohn, Alan L.

AU - Yin, H. Shonna

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background and Objectives A recent American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement recommends milliliter-exclusive dosing for pediatric liquid medications. Little is known about parent preferences regarding units, perceptions about moving to milliliters only, and the role of health literacy and prior milliliter-dosing experience. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of data collected as part of a randomized controlled study in 3 urban pediatric clinics (SAFE Rx for Kids study). English- and Spanish-speaking parents (n = 493) of children aged ≤8 years were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms and given labels and dosing tools which varied in label instruction format (text plus pictogram, text only) and units (milliliter only [“mL”], milliliter/teaspoon [“mL”/“tsp”]). Outcomes included teaspoon preference in dosing instructions and perceived difficulty with milliliter-only dosing. The predictor variable was health literacy (Newest Vital Sign; low [0–1], marginal [2–3], adequate [4–6]). The mediating variable was prior milliliter-dosing experience. Results Over two-thirds of parents had low or marginal health literacy. The majority (>70%) preferred to use milliliters, perceived milliliter-only dosing to be easy, and had prior milliliter-dosing experience; 11.5% had a teaspoon preference, 18.1% perceived milliliter-only dosing will be difficult, and 17.7% had no prior milliliter-dosing experience. Parents with lower health literacy had a higher odds of having a teaspoon preference (low vs adequate: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.9 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–6.2]), and greater odds of perceiving difficulty with milliliter-only dosing (low vs adequate: AOR = 13.9 [95% CI 4.8–40.6], marginal vs adequate: AOR = 7.1 [95% CI 2.5–20.4]). Lack of experience with milliliter dosing partially mediated the impact of health literacy. Conclusions Most parents were comfortable with milliliter-only dosing. Parents with low health literacy were more likely to perceive milliliter-only dosing to be difficult; educational efforts will need to target this group to ensure safe medication use.

AB - Background and Objectives A recent American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement recommends milliliter-exclusive dosing for pediatric liquid medications. Little is known about parent preferences regarding units, perceptions about moving to milliliters only, and the role of health literacy and prior milliliter-dosing experience. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of data collected as part of a randomized controlled study in 3 urban pediatric clinics (SAFE Rx for Kids study). English- and Spanish-speaking parents (n = 493) of children aged ≤8 years were randomized to 1 of 4 study arms and given labels and dosing tools which varied in label instruction format (text plus pictogram, text only) and units (milliliter only [“mL”], milliliter/teaspoon [“mL”/“tsp”]). Outcomes included teaspoon preference in dosing instructions and perceived difficulty with milliliter-only dosing. The predictor variable was health literacy (Newest Vital Sign; low [0–1], marginal [2–3], adequate [4–6]). The mediating variable was prior milliliter-dosing experience. Results Over two-thirds of parents had low or marginal health literacy. The majority (>70%) preferred to use milliliters, perceived milliliter-only dosing to be easy, and had prior milliliter-dosing experience; 11.5% had a teaspoon preference, 18.1% perceived milliliter-only dosing will be difficult, and 17.7% had no prior milliliter-dosing experience. Parents with lower health literacy had a higher odds of having a teaspoon preference (low vs adequate: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.9 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–6.2]), and greater odds of perceiving difficulty with milliliter-only dosing (low vs adequate: AOR = 13.9 [95% CI 4.8–40.6], marginal vs adequate: AOR = 7.1 [95% CI 2.5–20.4]). Lack of experience with milliliter dosing partially mediated the impact of health literacy. Conclusions Most parents were comfortable with milliliter-only dosing. Parents with low health literacy were more likely to perceive milliliter-only dosing to be difficult; educational efforts will need to target this group to ensure safe medication use.

KW - ambulatory care

KW - dosing errors

KW - dosing units

KW - health communication

KW - health literacy

KW - medication errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020778898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020778898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.001

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 26

EP - 34

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 1

ER -