Abstract
Millions of young children undergo surgery and anesthesia each year, yet there is a lack of scientific consensus about the safety of anesthesia exposure for the developing brain. Also poorly understood is parental anesthesia-related decision-making and how neurotoxicity information influences their choices. The theoretical model of parental decision-making generated in this research explicates this process. Interviews with 24 mothers yielded a theoretical framework based on their narratives developed using a qualitative grounded theory analysis. Five major themes emerged from these interviews: emotional processing, cognitive processing, relationships as resources, the mother/child dyad, and the health care context. Mothers described a non-linear, iterative process; they moved fluidly through emotional and cognitive processing supported by relationships as resources and influenced by the health care context. A key element was the subtheme of the medical translator, an individual who provided context and information. The mother/child dyad grounded the model in the relationship with the child.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 904-911 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Western Journal of Nursing Research |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2022 |
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Research was sponsored by Lurie Children’s Hospital via a Prince Grant.
Keywords
- Anesthesia
- Decision-making
- Grounded theory
- Parent
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Nursing