Patience in a foraging-horticultural society: A test of competing hypotheses

Ricardo Godoy*, Elizabeth Byron, Victoria Reyes-García, William R. Leonard, Karishma Patel, Lilian Apaza, Eddy Pérez, Vincent Vadez, David Wilkie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Patience, or the ability to delay gratification, matters in the behavioral and medical sciences and in public policy because it correlates with a wide range of desirable outcomes. For instance, patience correlates positively with income, wealth, conservation of natural resources, health, and savings and negatively with crime and drug addiction. Anthropologists have made few contributions to cross-cultural studies of patience despite its importance. Drawing on five-quarter panel data from 154 Amerindians (10-80 years of age) from the Tsimane' foraging-horticultural society in the Bolivian Amazon, we use hyperbolic and exponential discounting to estimate patience and the correlation between patience and (a) modern human capital, (b) personal affluence, and (c) age. Levels of impatience in Tsimane' society are higher than in Western societies. We find a strong negative correlation between schooling and impatience and a weaker, but still negative, correlation between impatience and modern human-capital skills. We find mixed support for (b), probably because of sharing and reciprocity. We also find mixed support for (c), probably because of a truncated sample and measurement error of the age variable. We discuss areas for future research to encourage anthropologists to contribute to the cross-cultural understanding of patience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-202
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Anthropological Research
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patience in a foraging-horticultural society: A test of competing hypotheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this