Patient and hospital characteristics associated with interhospital transfer for adults with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure

Nandita R. Nadig*, Andrew J. Goodwin, Annie N. Simpson, Kit N. Simpson, Jeremy Richards, Dee W. Ford

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Onale: Patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure have improved outcomes at centers with greater expertise; yet, most patients are not treated in such facilities. Efforts to align care for respiratory failure and hospital capability would necessarily require interhospital transfer. Objectives: To characterize the prevalence and the patient and hospital factors associated with interhospital transfer of adults residing in Florida with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure. Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational study using Florida Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data. We selected patients 18 years of age and older with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes of respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation during 2012 and 2013, and we identified cohorts of patients that did and did not undergo interhospital transfer. We obtained patient sociodemographic and clinical variables and categorized hospitals into subtypes on the basis of patient volume and services provided: large, medium (nonprofit or for-profit), and small. Results: Interhospital transfer was our primary outcome measure. Patient sociodemographics, clinical variables, and hospital types were used as covariates. We identified 2,580 patients with ventilatordependent respiratory failure who underwent interhospital transfer. Overall, transfer was uncommon, with only 2.9% of patients being transferred. In a hierarchical model, age less than 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77-2.45) and tracheostomy (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.80-3.65) were associated with higher odds of transfer, whereas having Medicaid was associated with lower odds of transfer than having commercial insurance (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75). Additionally, care in medium-sized for-profit hospitals was associated with lower odds of transfer (OR, 1.37 vs. 2.70) than care in medium nonprofit hospitals, despite similar hospital characteristics. Conclusions: In Florida, interhospital transfer of patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure is uncommon and more likely among younger, commercially insured, medically resourceintensive patients. For-profit hospitals are less likely to transfer than nonprofit hospitals. In future studies, researchers should test for geographic variations and examine the clinical implications of selectivity in interhospital transfer of patients with ventilatordependent respiratory failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)730-736
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2017
Externally publishedYes


  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
  • Nonprofit status
  • Profit status
  • State inpatient database

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Patient and hospital characteristics associated with interhospital transfer for adults with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this