Patient Education for Kidney Failure Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Study

Susan Koch-Weser, Thalia Porteny, Dena E. Rifkin, Tamara Isakova, Elisa J. Gordon, Ana Rossi, Geri Lynn Baumblatt, Jennifer St. Clair Russell, Kelli Collins Damron, Shennon Wofford, Arushi Agarwal, Daniel E. Weiner, Keren Ladin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Education programs are needed for people with advanced chronic kidney disease to understand kidney failure treatment options and participate in shared decision-making (SDM). Little is known about the content and accessibility of current education programs or whether they support SDM. Study Design: Stakeholder-engaged, mixed-methods design incorporating qualitative observations and interviews, and a quantitative content analysis of slide presentations. Setting & Participants: Four sites located in Boston, Chicago, Portland (Maine), and San Diego. Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis based on the Ottawa Framework (observations and interviews) and descriptive statistical analysis (slide presentations). Results: Data were collected from observations of 9 education sessions, 5 semistructured interviews with educators, and 133 educational slide presentations. Sites offered group classes or one-on-one sessions. Development, quality, and accuracy of educational materials varied widely. Educators emphasized dialysis (often in-center hemodialysis), with little mention of conservative management. Educators reported patients were often referred too late to education sessions and that some patients become overwhelmed if they learn of the implications of kidney failure in a group setting. Commonly, sessions were general and did not provide opportunities for tailored information most supportive of SDM. Few nephrologists were involved in education sessions or aware of the educational content. Content gaps included prognosis, decision support, mental health and cognition, advance care planning, cost, and diet. Slide presentations used did not consistently reflect best practices related to health literacy. Limitations: Findings may not be broadly generalizable. Conclusions: Education sessions focused on kidney failure treatment options do not consistently follow best practices related to health literacy or for supporting SDM. To facilitate SDM, the establishment of expectations for kidney failure treatment options should be clearly defined and integrated into the clinical workflow. Addressing content gaps, health literacy, and communication with nephrologists is necessary to improve patient education in the setting of advanced chronic kidney disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)690-699
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume78
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Kidney
  • aging
  • care planning
  • chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  • conservative care
  • decisional support
  • direct observation
  • health literacy
  • interviews
  • knowledge gap
  • patient education
  • patient-centered
  • qualitative
  • reading level
  • renal replacement therapy (RRT)
  • shared decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient Education for Kidney Failure Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this