Patient Perceptions About Prediabetes and Preferences for Diabetes Prevention

Matthew James O'Brien*, Margaret R. Moran, Joyce W. Tang, Maria C. Vargas, Mary Talen, Laura J. Zimmermann, Ronald T Ackermann, Namratha R Kandula

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how adults with prediabetes perceive their risk of developing diabetes and examine their preferences for evidence-based treatment options to prevent diabetes. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in 2 large Midwest primary care practices, involving in-depth semistructured interviews with 35 adult patients with prediabetes. Results: This ethnically diverse (77% nonwhite) sample of middle-aged primary care patients exhibited multiple diabetes risk factors. Knowledge gaps about prediabetes and its medical management were pervasive. Most patients overestimated the risk of developing diabetes and were not familiar with evidence-based treatment options for prediabetes. They suggested that receiving brief, yet specific information about these topics during the study interview motivated them to act. The majority of participants considered both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options. Many preferred initial treatment with intensive lifestyle intervention but would take metformin if their efforts at lifestyle change failed and their primary care physician recommended it. Some participants expressed wanting to combine both treatments. Conclusions: This qualitative study highlights potential opportunities to promote patient-centered dialogue about prediabetes in primary care settings. Providing patients specific information about the risk of developing diabetes and evidence-based treatment options to prevent or delay its onset may encourage action. Physicians’ prediabetes counseling efforts should be informed by the finding that most patients consider both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)667-677
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetes Educator
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Prediabetic State
Life Style
Metformin
Primary Health Care
Therapeutics
Interviews
Primary Care Physicians
Counseling
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Cite this

O'Brien, Matthew James ; Moran, Margaret R. ; Tang, Joyce W. ; Vargas, Maria C. ; Talen, Mary ; Zimmermann, Laura J. ; Ackermann, Ronald T ; Kandula, Namratha R. / Patient Perceptions About Prediabetes and Preferences for Diabetes Prevention. In: Diabetes Educator. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 667-677.
@article{218b963cf5634b1ab9c4374f20252173,
title = "Patient Perceptions About Prediabetes and Preferences for Diabetes Prevention",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how adults with prediabetes perceive their risk of developing diabetes and examine their preferences for evidence-based treatment options to prevent diabetes. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in 2 large Midwest primary care practices, involving in-depth semistructured interviews with 35 adult patients with prediabetes. Results: This ethnically diverse (77{\%} nonwhite) sample of middle-aged primary care patients exhibited multiple diabetes risk factors. Knowledge gaps about prediabetes and its medical management were pervasive. Most patients overestimated the risk of developing diabetes and were not familiar with evidence-based treatment options for prediabetes. They suggested that receiving brief, yet specific information about these topics during the study interview motivated them to act. The majority of participants considered both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options. Many preferred initial treatment with intensive lifestyle intervention but would take metformin if their efforts at lifestyle change failed and their primary care physician recommended it. Some participants expressed wanting to combine both treatments. Conclusions: This qualitative study highlights potential opportunities to promote patient-centered dialogue about prediabetes in primary care settings. Providing patients specific information about the risk of developing diabetes and evidence-based treatment options to prevent or delay its onset may encourage action. Physicians’ prediabetes counseling efforts should be informed by the finding that most patients consider both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options.",
author = "O'Brien, {Matthew James} and Moran, {Margaret R.} and Tang, {Joyce W.} and Vargas, {Maria C.} and Mary Talen and Zimmermann, {Laura J.} and Ackermann, {Ronald T} and Kandula, {Namratha R}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0145721716666678",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "667--677",
journal = "Diabetes Educator",
issn = "0145-7217",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Patient Perceptions About Prediabetes and Preferences for Diabetes Prevention. / O'Brien, Matthew James; Moran, Margaret R.; Tang, Joyce W.; Vargas, Maria C.; Talen, Mary; Zimmermann, Laura J.; Ackermann, Ronald T; Kandula, Namratha R.

In: Diabetes Educator, Vol. 42, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 667-677.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient Perceptions About Prediabetes and Preferences for Diabetes Prevention

AU - O'Brien, Matthew James

AU - Moran, Margaret R.

AU - Tang, Joyce W.

AU - Vargas, Maria C.

AU - Talen, Mary

AU - Zimmermann, Laura J.

AU - Ackermann, Ronald T

AU - Kandula, Namratha R

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how adults with prediabetes perceive their risk of developing diabetes and examine their preferences for evidence-based treatment options to prevent diabetes. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in 2 large Midwest primary care practices, involving in-depth semistructured interviews with 35 adult patients with prediabetes. Results: This ethnically diverse (77% nonwhite) sample of middle-aged primary care patients exhibited multiple diabetes risk factors. Knowledge gaps about prediabetes and its medical management were pervasive. Most patients overestimated the risk of developing diabetes and were not familiar with evidence-based treatment options for prediabetes. They suggested that receiving brief, yet specific information about these topics during the study interview motivated them to act. The majority of participants considered both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options. Many preferred initial treatment with intensive lifestyle intervention but would take metformin if their efforts at lifestyle change failed and their primary care physician recommended it. Some participants expressed wanting to combine both treatments. Conclusions: This qualitative study highlights potential opportunities to promote patient-centered dialogue about prediabetes in primary care settings. Providing patients specific information about the risk of developing diabetes and evidence-based treatment options to prevent or delay its onset may encourage action. Physicians’ prediabetes counseling efforts should be informed by the finding that most patients consider both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how adults with prediabetes perceive their risk of developing diabetes and examine their preferences for evidence-based treatment options to prevent diabetes. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in 2 large Midwest primary care practices, involving in-depth semistructured interviews with 35 adult patients with prediabetes. Results: This ethnically diverse (77% nonwhite) sample of middle-aged primary care patients exhibited multiple diabetes risk factors. Knowledge gaps about prediabetes and its medical management were pervasive. Most patients overestimated the risk of developing diabetes and were not familiar with evidence-based treatment options for prediabetes. They suggested that receiving brief, yet specific information about these topics during the study interview motivated them to act. The majority of participants considered both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options. Many preferred initial treatment with intensive lifestyle intervention but would take metformin if their efforts at lifestyle change failed and their primary care physician recommended it. Some participants expressed wanting to combine both treatments. Conclusions: This qualitative study highlights potential opportunities to promote patient-centered dialogue about prediabetes in primary care settings. Providing patients specific information about the risk of developing diabetes and evidence-based treatment options to prevent or delay its onset may encourage action. Physicians’ prediabetes counseling efforts should be informed by the finding that most patients consider both intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin acceptable treatment options.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994527444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994527444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0145721716666678

DO - 10.1177/0145721716666678

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 667

EP - 677

JO - Diabetes Educator

JF - Diabetes Educator

SN - 0145-7217

IS - 6

ER -