TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient Perspectives on the Use of Frailty, Cognitive Function, and Age in Kidney Transplant Evaluation
AU - Shrestha, Prakriti
AU - Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E.
AU - Fazal, Maria
AU - Chu, Nadia M.
AU - Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline M.
AU - Gordon, Elisa J.
AU - McAdams-DeMarco, Mara
AU - Humbyrd, Casey Jo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the bioethics supplement to grant number R01AG055781 and grant number K01AG064040 from the National Institute on Aging (NIA).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The allocation of scarce deceased donor kidneys is a complex process. Transplant providers are increasingly relying on constructs such as frailty and cognitive function to guide kidney transplant (KT) candidate selection. Patient views of the ethical issues surrounding the use of such constructs are unclear. We sought to assess KT candidates’ attitudes and beliefs about the use of frailty and cognitive function to guide waitlist selection. Methods: KT candidates were randomly recruited from an ongoing single-center cohort study of frailty and cognitive function. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis was performed. Inductively derived themes were mapped onto bioethics principles. Results: Twenty interviews were conducted (65% contact rate, 100% participation rate) (60% male; 70% White). With respect to the use of frailty and cognitive function in waitlisting decisions, four themes emerged in which participants: (1) valued maximizing a scarce resource (utility); (2) prioritized equal access to all patients (equity); (3) appreciated a proportional approach to the use of equity and utility (precautionary utility); and (4) sought to weigh utility- and equity-based concerns regarding social support. While some participants believed frailty and cognitive function were useful constructs to maximize utility, others believed their use would jeopardize equity. Patients were uncomfortable with using single factors such as frailty or cognitive impairment to deny someone access to transplantation; participants instead encouraged using the constructs to identify opportunities for intervention to improve frailty and cognitive function prior to KT. Conclusions: KT candidates’ values mirrored the current allocation strategy, seeking to balance equity and utility in a just manner, albeit with conflicting viewpoints on the appropriate use of frailty and cognitive impairment in waitlisting decisions.
AB - Background: The allocation of scarce deceased donor kidneys is a complex process. Transplant providers are increasingly relying on constructs such as frailty and cognitive function to guide kidney transplant (KT) candidate selection. Patient views of the ethical issues surrounding the use of such constructs are unclear. We sought to assess KT candidates’ attitudes and beliefs about the use of frailty and cognitive function to guide waitlist selection. Methods: KT candidates were randomly recruited from an ongoing single-center cohort study of frailty and cognitive function. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis was performed. Inductively derived themes were mapped onto bioethics principles. Results: Twenty interviews were conducted (65% contact rate, 100% participation rate) (60% male; 70% White). With respect to the use of frailty and cognitive function in waitlisting decisions, four themes emerged in which participants: (1) valued maximizing a scarce resource (utility); (2) prioritized equal access to all patients (equity); (3) appreciated a proportional approach to the use of equity and utility (precautionary utility); and (4) sought to weigh utility- and equity-based concerns regarding social support. While some participants believed frailty and cognitive function were useful constructs to maximize utility, others believed their use would jeopardize equity. Patients were uncomfortable with using single factors such as frailty or cognitive impairment to deny someone access to transplantation; participants instead encouraged using the constructs to identify opportunities for intervention to improve frailty and cognitive function prior to KT. Conclusions: KT candidates’ values mirrored the current allocation strategy, seeking to balance equity and utility in a just manner, albeit with conflicting viewpoints on the appropriate use of frailty and cognitive impairment in waitlisting decisions.
KW - Frailty
KW - age
KW - bioethics
KW - cognitive impairment
KW - kidney transplantation
KW - social support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133665126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133665126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090460
DO - 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090460
M3 - Article
C2 - 35802563
AN - SCOPUS:85133665126
SN - 2329-4515
VL - 13
SP - 263
EP - 274
JO - AJOB Empirical Bioethics
JF - AJOB Empirical Bioethics
IS - 4
ER -