TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-reported outcomes as end points and outcome indicators in solid tumours
AU - Secord, Angeles A.
AU - Coleman, Robert L.
AU - Havrilesky, Laura J.
AU - Abernethy, Amy P.
AU - Samsa, Gregory P.
AU - Cella, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/6/30
Y1 - 2015/6/30
N2 - Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as quality of life, have been associated with relevant clinical end points and are prognostic for survival outcomes in a variety of solid cancers in adults. In the past few years, PROs have garnered a greater influence as established and clinically relevant measures that could alter the current paradigm of practice-changing therapeutic advances, as it has been recognized that classic clinical end points do not accurately portray a full appreciation of the benefits, risks and costs of therapy. In this Review, we comprehensively assess the correlation of PROs with treatment response and survival, and explore tumour-related and patient-centric composite end points in patients with cancer participating in clinical trials. Comparisons or composite end points that consider tumour-related and PRO components might help health-care providers, patients with cancer and decision makers to better understand the total clinical benefit of therapeutic interventions.
AB - Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as quality of life, have been associated with relevant clinical end points and are prognostic for survival outcomes in a variety of solid cancers in adults. In the past few years, PROs have garnered a greater influence as established and clinically relevant measures that could alter the current paradigm of practice-changing therapeutic advances, as it has been recognized that classic clinical end points do not accurately portray a full appreciation of the benefits, risks and costs of therapy. In this Review, we comprehensively assess the correlation of PROs with treatment response and survival, and explore tumour-related and patient-centric composite end points in patients with cancer participating in clinical trials. Comparisons or composite end points that consider tumour-related and PRO components might help health-care providers, patients with cancer and decision makers to better understand the total clinical benefit of therapeutic interventions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930178766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930178766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.29
DO - 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.29
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25754949
AN - SCOPUS:84930178766
SN - 1759-4774
VL - 12
SP - 358
EP - 370
JO - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
JF - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
IS - 6
ER -