TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth Visits for New Patient Appointments for Pelvic Floor Disorders
T2 - A Randomized Trial of Telehealth Versus Standard In-Person Office Visits
AU - Das, Deepanjana
AU - Kenton, Kimberly
AU - Mueller, Margaret
AU - Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
AU - Collins, Sarah
AU - Bretschneider, C. Emi
AU - Geynisman-Tan, Julia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 American Urogynecologic Society.
PY - 2023/2/1
Y1 - 2023/2/1
N2 - Importance: The acceptability and safety of telehealth have been reported in urogynecology for preoperative and postoperative care but not new patient consultation. Objectives: This study aimed to determine if new patient telehealth encounters are noninferior to in-person encounters for women presenting to a urogynecology clinic using a satisfaction questionnaire. Secondary objectives were to describe patient experiences and follow-up. Study Design: A randomized controlled trial of telehealth versus in-person consults for new patients with any urogynecologic condition was conducted. Patients completed the validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 (PSQ-18) after the visit. The primary outcome was composite PSQ-18 score. Using a noninferiority margin of 5 points on the PSQ-18, 25 patients per arm were required with a power of 80% and an α of 0.05. Results: From March to September 2021, 133 patients were screened, 71 were randomized, and 58 were included in the final analysis (30 telehealth and 28 in-person). Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 composite scores were high for both groups but higher for in-person versus telehealth visits (75.68 ± 8.55 vs 66.60 ± 11.80; P = 0.001; difference, 9.08); results were inconclusive with respect to noninferiority. Women in the telehealth group expressed uncertainty regarding the telehealth format. There were no differences in short-term follow-up, communication with the office, or treatment chosen between groups. Conclusions: Women seen by urogynecologic providers for a new consult both via in-person or telehealth visits demonstrated high satisfaction with their first visit. We were unable to determine if telehealth is noninferior to in-person visits. Our study adds to the literature that telehealth is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients.
AB - Importance: The acceptability and safety of telehealth have been reported in urogynecology for preoperative and postoperative care but not new patient consultation. Objectives: This study aimed to determine if new patient telehealth encounters are noninferior to in-person encounters for women presenting to a urogynecology clinic using a satisfaction questionnaire. Secondary objectives were to describe patient experiences and follow-up. Study Design: A randomized controlled trial of telehealth versus in-person consults for new patients with any urogynecologic condition was conducted. Patients completed the validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 (PSQ-18) after the visit. The primary outcome was composite PSQ-18 score. Using a noninferiority margin of 5 points on the PSQ-18, 25 patients per arm were required with a power of 80% and an α of 0.05. Results: From March to September 2021, 133 patients were screened, 71 were randomized, and 58 were included in the final analysis (30 telehealth and 28 in-person). Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 composite scores were high for both groups but higher for in-person versus telehealth visits (75.68 ± 8.55 vs 66.60 ± 11.80; P = 0.001; difference, 9.08); results were inconclusive with respect to noninferiority. Women in the telehealth group expressed uncertainty regarding the telehealth format. There were no differences in short-term follow-up, communication with the office, or treatment chosen between groups. Conclusions: Women seen by urogynecologic providers for a new consult both via in-person or telehealth visits demonstrated high satisfaction with their first visit. We were unable to determine if telehealth is noninferior to in-person visits. Our study adds to the literature that telehealth is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147119227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147119227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001280
DO - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001280
M3 - Article
C2 - 36735444
AN - SCOPUS:85147119227
SN - 2771-1897
VL - 29
SP - 273
EP - 280
JO - Urogynecology
JF - Urogynecology
IS - 2
ER -