Patterns of performance of retroperitoneal lymph node dissections by American urologists: Most retroperitoneal lymph node dissections in the United States are performed by low-volume surgeons

Andrew S. Flum, Laurie Bachrach, Borko Jovanovic, Irene B. Helenowski, Sarah C Flury, Joshua J Meeks*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To characterize the current patterns of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) performance among practicing US urologists. Methods Six-month case log data of urologists certifying between 2003 and 2013 were obtained from the American Board of Urology. Cases specifying both an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for testis cancer and a Current Procedural Terminology code for RPLND were analyzed for surgeon-specific variables. Results Among 8545 certifying urologists, 290 (3.4% of all) urologists logged 553 RPLNDs in the case log system with 21 (3.6%) performed laparoscopically. Median number of RPLNDs logged annually was 1 (range, 1-59; interquartile range, 1-1) with 3 urologists performing 23% of all RPLNDs. Seventy-five percent of urologists logged a single RPLND. Urologists who logged 2 RPLNDs in a year were in the top 25% of performers with over half (52%) of all RPLNDs performed by urologists who logged 1 or 2 RPLND. On univariate regression analysis, oncology specialization (odds ratio, 5.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.2-11.6; P = .0001]) and non-private practice type (odds ratio, 2.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03]) were predictive of top 10% (≥3 cases) surgeon RPLND volume. Conclusion Despite the critical importance of the surgical quality for outcomes of patients with testis cancer, the majority of surgeons performing RPLND are certifying for the first time and log only 1 RPLND.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1325-1328
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume84
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Lymph Node Excision
Testicular Neoplasms
Odds Ratio
Current Procedural Terminology
Confidence Intervals
Urologists
Surgeons
Urology
International Classification of Diseases
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{6b4a4a35ba10425185988dd545215500,
title = "Patterns of performance of retroperitoneal lymph node dissections by American urologists: Most retroperitoneal lymph node dissections in the United States are performed by low-volume surgeons",
abstract = "Objective To characterize the current patterns of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) performance among practicing US urologists. Methods Six-month case log data of urologists certifying between 2003 and 2013 were obtained from the American Board of Urology. Cases specifying both an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for testis cancer and a Current Procedural Terminology code for RPLND were analyzed for surgeon-specific variables. Results Among 8545 certifying urologists, 290 (3.4{\%} of all) urologists logged 553 RPLNDs in the case log system with 21 (3.6{\%}) performed laparoscopically. Median number of RPLNDs logged annually was 1 (range, 1-59; interquartile range, 1-1) with 3 urologists performing 23{\%} of all RPLNDs. Seventy-five percent of urologists logged a single RPLND. Urologists who logged 2 RPLNDs in a year were in the top 25{\%} of performers with over half (52{\%}) of all RPLNDs performed by urologists who logged 1 or 2 RPLND. On univariate regression analysis, oncology specialization (odds ratio, 5.1 [95{\%} confidence interval, 2.2-11.6; P = .0001]) and non-private practice type (odds ratio, 2.8 [95{\%} confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03]) were predictive of top 10{\%} (≥3 cases) surgeon RPLND volume. Conclusion Despite the critical importance of the surgical quality for outcomes of patients with testis cancer, the majority of surgeons performing RPLND are certifying for the first time and log only 1 RPLND.",
author = "Flum, {Andrew S.} and Laurie Bachrach and Borko Jovanovic and Helenowski, {Irene B.} and Flury, {Sarah C} and Meeks, {Joshua J}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "1325--1328",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of performance of retroperitoneal lymph node dissections by American urologists

T2 - Most retroperitoneal lymph node dissections in the United States are performed by low-volume surgeons

AU - Flum, Andrew S.

AU - Bachrach, Laurie

AU - Jovanovic, Borko

AU - Helenowski, Irene B.

AU - Flury, Sarah C

AU - Meeks, Joshua J

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Objective To characterize the current patterns of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) performance among practicing US urologists. Methods Six-month case log data of urologists certifying between 2003 and 2013 were obtained from the American Board of Urology. Cases specifying both an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for testis cancer and a Current Procedural Terminology code for RPLND were analyzed for surgeon-specific variables. Results Among 8545 certifying urologists, 290 (3.4% of all) urologists logged 553 RPLNDs in the case log system with 21 (3.6%) performed laparoscopically. Median number of RPLNDs logged annually was 1 (range, 1-59; interquartile range, 1-1) with 3 urologists performing 23% of all RPLNDs. Seventy-five percent of urologists logged a single RPLND. Urologists who logged 2 RPLNDs in a year were in the top 25% of performers with over half (52%) of all RPLNDs performed by urologists who logged 1 or 2 RPLND. On univariate regression analysis, oncology specialization (odds ratio, 5.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.2-11.6; P = .0001]) and non-private practice type (odds ratio, 2.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03]) were predictive of top 10% (≥3 cases) surgeon RPLND volume. Conclusion Despite the critical importance of the surgical quality for outcomes of patients with testis cancer, the majority of surgeons performing RPLND are certifying for the first time and log only 1 RPLND.

AB - Objective To characterize the current patterns of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) performance among practicing US urologists. Methods Six-month case log data of urologists certifying between 2003 and 2013 were obtained from the American Board of Urology. Cases specifying both an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for testis cancer and a Current Procedural Terminology code for RPLND were analyzed for surgeon-specific variables. Results Among 8545 certifying urologists, 290 (3.4% of all) urologists logged 553 RPLNDs in the case log system with 21 (3.6%) performed laparoscopically. Median number of RPLNDs logged annually was 1 (range, 1-59; interquartile range, 1-1) with 3 urologists performing 23% of all RPLNDs. Seventy-five percent of urologists logged a single RPLND. Urologists who logged 2 RPLNDs in a year were in the top 25% of performers with over half (52%) of all RPLNDs performed by urologists who logged 1 or 2 RPLND. On univariate regression analysis, oncology specialization (odds ratio, 5.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.2-11.6; P = .0001]) and non-private practice type (odds ratio, 2.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03]) were predictive of top 10% (≥3 cases) surgeon RPLND volume. Conclusion Despite the critical importance of the surgical quality for outcomes of patients with testis cancer, the majority of surgeons performing RPLND are certifying for the first time and log only 1 RPLND.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922397833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922397833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.054

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.054

M3 - Article

C2 - 25306483

AN - SCOPUS:84922397833

VL - 84

SP - 1325

EP - 1328

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 6

ER -