TY - JOUR
T1 - Patterns of performance of retroperitoneal lymph node dissections by American urologists
T2 - Most retroperitoneal lymph node dissections in the United States are performed by low-volume surgeons
AU - Flum, Andrew S.
AU - Bachrach, Laurie
AU - Jovanovic, Borko D.
AU - Helenowski, Irene B.
AU - Flury, Sarah C.
AU - Meeks, Joshua J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Objective To characterize the current patterns of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) performance among practicing US urologists. Methods Six-month case log data of urologists certifying between 2003 and 2013 were obtained from the American Board of Urology. Cases specifying both an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for testis cancer and a Current Procedural Terminology code for RPLND were analyzed for surgeon-specific variables. Results Among 8545 certifying urologists, 290 (3.4% of all) urologists logged 553 RPLNDs in the case log system with 21 (3.6%) performed laparoscopically. Median number of RPLNDs logged annually was 1 (range, 1-59; interquartile range, 1-1) with 3 urologists performing 23% of all RPLNDs. Seventy-five percent of urologists logged a single RPLND. Urologists who logged 2 RPLNDs in a year were in the top 25% of performers with over half (52%) of all RPLNDs performed by urologists who logged 1 or 2 RPLND. On univariate regression analysis, oncology specialization (odds ratio, 5.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.2-11.6; P = .0001]) and non-private practice type (odds ratio, 2.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03]) were predictive of top 10% (≥3 cases) surgeon RPLND volume. Conclusion Despite the critical importance of the surgical quality for outcomes of patients with testis cancer, the majority of surgeons performing RPLND are certifying for the first time and log only 1 RPLND.
AB - Objective To characterize the current patterns of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) performance among practicing US urologists. Methods Six-month case log data of urologists certifying between 2003 and 2013 were obtained from the American Board of Urology. Cases specifying both an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for testis cancer and a Current Procedural Terminology code for RPLND were analyzed for surgeon-specific variables. Results Among 8545 certifying urologists, 290 (3.4% of all) urologists logged 553 RPLNDs in the case log system with 21 (3.6%) performed laparoscopically. Median number of RPLNDs logged annually was 1 (range, 1-59; interquartile range, 1-1) with 3 urologists performing 23% of all RPLNDs. Seventy-five percent of urologists logged a single RPLND. Urologists who logged 2 RPLNDs in a year were in the top 25% of performers with over half (52%) of all RPLNDs performed by urologists who logged 1 or 2 RPLND. On univariate regression analysis, oncology specialization (odds ratio, 5.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.2-11.6; P = .0001]) and non-private practice type (odds ratio, 2.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03]) were predictive of top 10% (≥3 cases) surgeon RPLND volume. Conclusion Despite the critical importance of the surgical quality for outcomes of patients with testis cancer, the majority of surgeons performing RPLND are certifying for the first time and log only 1 RPLND.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922397833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922397833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.054
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.054
M3 - Article
C2 - 25306483
AN - SCOPUS:84922397833
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 84
SP - 1325
EP - 1328
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 6
ER -