TY - JOUR
T1 - Pediatric Agitation in the Emergency Department
T2 - A Survey of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators
AU - Foster, Ashley A.
AU - Saidinejad, Mohsen
AU - Duffy, Susan
AU - Hoffmann, Jennifer A.
AU - Goodman, Robin
AU - Monuteaux, Michael C.
AU - Li, Joyce
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the Emergency Medical Services for Children Innovation and Improvement Center and the Emergency Medical Services for Children Scholars Program for their support. The Emergency Medical Services for Children Innovation and Improvement Center is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of the cooperative agreement (U07MC37471). Funding/Support: The project was done with no specific support. M.S. reports funding for EMS for Children Innovation and Improvement Center (1U07MC3747101-00).
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the Emergency Medical Services for Children Innovation and Improvement Center and the Emergency Medical Services for Children Scholars Program for their support. The Emergency Medical Services for Children Innovation and Improvement Center is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of the cooperative agreement (U07MC37471).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Academic Pediatric Association
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Objective: Acute agitation episodes in the emergency department (ED) can be distressing for patients, families, and staff and may lead to injuries. We aim to understand availability of ED resources to care for children with acute agitation, perceived staff confidence with agitation management, barriers to use of de-escalation techniques, and desired resources to enhance care. Methods: We conducted a survey of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in EDs in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Los Angeles County, California. Results: PECCs from 63 of 102 (61.8%) EDs responded. PECCs reported that ED staff feel least confident managing agitation due to developmental delay (DD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (52.4%). Few EDs had a separate space to care for children with mental health conditions (22.5%), a standardized agitation scale (9.6%), an agitation management guideline (12.9%), or agitation management training (24.2%). Modification of the environment was not perceived possible for 42% of EDs. Participants reported that a barrier to the use of the de-escalation techniques distraction and verbal de-escalation was perceived lack of effectiveness (22.6% and 22.6%, respectively). Desired resources to manage agitation included guidelines for medications (82.5%) and sample care pathways (57.1%). Conclusions: ED PECCs report low confidence in managing agitation due to DD or ASD and limited pediatric resources to address acute agitation. Additional pediatric-specific resources and training, especially for children with DD or ASD, are needed to increase clinician confidence in agitation management and to promote high-quality, patient-centered care. Training programs can focus on the early identification of agitation and the effective use of non-invasive de-escalation strategies.
AB - Objective: Acute agitation episodes in the emergency department (ED) can be distressing for patients, families, and staff and may lead to injuries. We aim to understand availability of ED resources to care for children with acute agitation, perceived staff confidence with agitation management, barriers to use of de-escalation techniques, and desired resources to enhance care. Methods: We conducted a survey of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in EDs in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Los Angeles County, California. Results: PECCs from 63 of 102 (61.8%) EDs responded. PECCs reported that ED staff feel least confident managing agitation due to developmental delay (DD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (52.4%). Few EDs had a separate space to care for children with mental health conditions (22.5%), a standardized agitation scale (9.6%), an agitation management guideline (12.9%), or agitation management training (24.2%). Modification of the environment was not perceived possible for 42% of EDs. Participants reported that a barrier to the use of the de-escalation techniques distraction and verbal de-escalation was perceived lack of effectiveness (22.6% and 22.6%, respectively). Desired resources to manage agitation included guidelines for medications (82.5%) and sample care pathways (57.1%). Conclusions: ED PECCs report low confidence in managing agitation due to DD or ASD and limited pediatric resources to address acute agitation. Additional pediatric-specific resources and training, especially for children with DD or ASD, are needed to increase clinician confidence in agitation management and to promote high-quality, patient-centered care. Training programs can focus on the early identification of agitation and the effective use of non-invasive de-escalation strategies.
KW - agitation
KW - emergency department
KW - mental and behavioral health
KW - pediatric preparedness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159191384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159191384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2023.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2023.03.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 36948291
AN - SCOPUS:85159191384
SN - 1876-2859
VL - 23
SP - 988
EP - 992
JO - Academic Pediatrics
JF - Academic Pediatrics
IS - 5
ER -