Pediatric anesthesiology fellows' perception of quality of attending supervision and medical errors

Hubert Benzon*, John Hajduk, Gildasio De Oliveira, Santhanam Suresh, Sarah L. Nizamuddin, Robert McCarthy, Narasimhan Jagannathan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Appropriate supervision has been shown to reduce medical errors in anesthesiology residents and other trainees across various specialties. Nonetheless, supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows has yet to be evaluated. The main objective of this survey investigation was to evaluate supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. We hypothesized that there was an indirect association between perceived quality of faculty supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellow trainees and the frequency of medical errors reported. Methods: A survey of pediatric fellows from 53 pediatric anesthesiology fellowship programs in the United States was performed. The primary outcome was the frequency of self-reported errors by fellows, and the primary independent variable was supervision scores. Questions also assessed barriers for effective faculty supervision. Results: One hundred seventy-six pediatric anesthesiology fellows were invited to participate, and 104 (59%) responded to the survey. Nine of 103 (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-16%) respondents reported performing procedures, on >1 occasion, for which they were not properly trained for. Thirteen of 101 (13%, 95% CI, 7%-21%) reported making >1 mistake with negative consequence to patients, and 23 of 104 (22%, 95% CI, 15%-31%) reported >1 medication error in the last year. There were no differences in median (interquartile range) supervision scores between fellows who reported >1 medication error compared to those reporting ≤1 errors (3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 3.4 [3.1-3.7]; median difference, 0; 99% CI, -0.3 to 0.3; P = .96). Similarly, there were no differences in those who reported >1 mistake with negative patient consequences, 3.3 (3.0-3.7), compared with those who did not report mistakes with negative patient consequences (3.4 [3.3-3.7]; median difference, 0.1; 99% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .35). Conclusions: We detected a high rate of self-reported medication errors in pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. Interestingly, fellows' perception of quality of faculty supervision was not associated with the frequency of reported errors. The current results with a narrow CI suggest the need to evaluate other potential factors that can be associated with the high frequency of reported errors by pediatric fellows (eg, fatigue, burnout). The identification of factors that lead to medical errors by pediatric anesthesiology fellows should be a main research priority to improve both trainee education and best practices of pediatric anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-643
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia
Volume126
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Medical Errors
Anesthesiology
Pediatrics
Confidence Intervals
Medication Errors
Practice Guidelines
Fatigue
Anesthesia
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Benzon, Hubert ; Hajduk, John ; De Oliveira, Gildasio ; Suresh, Santhanam ; Nizamuddin, Sarah L. ; McCarthy, Robert ; Jagannathan, Narasimhan. / Pediatric anesthesiology fellows' perception of quality of attending supervision and medical errors. In: Anesthesia and analgesia. 2018 ; Vol. 126, No. 2. pp. 639-643.
@article{4d733f05961b485e8fafa36f441ac55f,
title = "Pediatric anesthesiology fellows' perception of quality of attending supervision and medical errors",
abstract = "Background: Appropriate supervision has been shown to reduce medical errors in anesthesiology residents and other trainees across various specialties. Nonetheless, supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows has yet to be evaluated. The main objective of this survey investigation was to evaluate supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. We hypothesized that there was an indirect association between perceived quality of faculty supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellow trainees and the frequency of medical errors reported. Methods: A survey of pediatric fellows from 53 pediatric anesthesiology fellowship programs in the United States was performed. The primary outcome was the frequency of self-reported errors by fellows, and the primary independent variable was supervision scores. Questions also assessed barriers for effective faculty supervision. Results: One hundred seventy-six pediatric anesthesiology fellows were invited to participate, and 104 (59{\%}) responded to the survey. Nine of 103 (9{\%}, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 4{\%}-16{\%}) respondents reported performing procedures, on >1 occasion, for which they were not properly trained for. Thirteen of 101 (13{\%}, 95{\%} CI, 7{\%}-21{\%}) reported making >1 mistake with negative consequence to patients, and 23 of 104 (22{\%}, 95{\%} CI, 15{\%}-31{\%}) reported >1 medication error in the last year. There were no differences in median (interquartile range) supervision scores between fellows who reported >1 medication error compared to those reporting ≤1 errors (3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 3.4 [3.1-3.7]; median difference, 0; 99{\%} CI, -0.3 to 0.3; P = .96). Similarly, there were no differences in those who reported >1 mistake with negative patient consequences, 3.3 (3.0-3.7), compared with those who did not report mistakes with negative patient consequences (3.4 [3.3-3.7]; median difference, 0.1; 99{\%} CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .35). Conclusions: We detected a high rate of self-reported medication errors in pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. Interestingly, fellows' perception of quality of faculty supervision was not associated with the frequency of reported errors. The current results with a narrow CI suggest the need to evaluate other potential factors that can be associated with the high frequency of reported errors by pediatric fellows (eg, fatigue, burnout). The identification of factors that lead to medical errors by pediatric anesthesiology fellows should be a main research priority to improve both trainee education and best practices of pediatric anesthesia.",
author = "Hubert Benzon and John Hajduk and {De Oliveira}, Gildasio and Santhanam Suresh and Nizamuddin, {Sarah L.} and Robert McCarthy and Narasimhan Jagannathan",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0000000000002445",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "639--643",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Pediatric anesthesiology fellows' perception of quality of attending supervision and medical errors. / Benzon, Hubert; Hajduk, John; De Oliveira, Gildasio; Suresh, Santhanam; Nizamuddin, Sarah L.; McCarthy, Robert; Jagannathan, Narasimhan.

In: Anesthesia and analgesia, Vol. 126, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 639-643.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pediatric anesthesiology fellows' perception of quality of attending supervision and medical errors

AU - Benzon, Hubert

AU - Hajduk, John

AU - De Oliveira, Gildasio

AU - Suresh, Santhanam

AU - Nizamuddin, Sarah L.

AU - McCarthy, Robert

AU - Jagannathan, Narasimhan

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Appropriate supervision has been shown to reduce medical errors in anesthesiology residents and other trainees across various specialties. Nonetheless, supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows has yet to be evaluated. The main objective of this survey investigation was to evaluate supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. We hypothesized that there was an indirect association between perceived quality of faculty supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellow trainees and the frequency of medical errors reported. Methods: A survey of pediatric fellows from 53 pediatric anesthesiology fellowship programs in the United States was performed. The primary outcome was the frequency of self-reported errors by fellows, and the primary independent variable was supervision scores. Questions also assessed barriers for effective faculty supervision. Results: One hundred seventy-six pediatric anesthesiology fellows were invited to participate, and 104 (59%) responded to the survey. Nine of 103 (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-16%) respondents reported performing procedures, on >1 occasion, for which they were not properly trained for. Thirteen of 101 (13%, 95% CI, 7%-21%) reported making >1 mistake with negative consequence to patients, and 23 of 104 (22%, 95% CI, 15%-31%) reported >1 medication error in the last year. There were no differences in median (interquartile range) supervision scores between fellows who reported >1 medication error compared to those reporting ≤1 errors (3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 3.4 [3.1-3.7]; median difference, 0; 99% CI, -0.3 to 0.3; P = .96). Similarly, there were no differences in those who reported >1 mistake with negative patient consequences, 3.3 (3.0-3.7), compared with those who did not report mistakes with negative patient consequences (3.4 [3.3-3.7]; median difference, 0.1; 99% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .35). Conclusions: We detected a high rate of self-reported medication errors in pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. Interestingly, fellows' perception of quality of faculty supervision was not associated with the frequency of reported errors. The current results with a narrow CI suggest the need to evaluate other potential factors that can be associated with the high frequency of reported errors by pediatric fellows (eg, fatigue, burnout). The identification of factors that lead to medical errors by pediatric anesthesiology fellows should be a main research priority to improve both trainee education and best practices of pediatric anesthesia.

AB - Background: Appropriate supervision has been shown to reduce medical errors in anesthesiology residents and other trainees across various specialties. Nonetheless, supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows has yet to be evaluated. The main objective of this survey investigation was to evaluate supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. We hypothesized that there was an indirect association between perceived quality of faculty supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellow trainees and the frequency of medical errors reported. Methods: A survey of pediatric fellows from 53 pediatric anesthesiology fellowship programs in the United States was performed. The primary outcome was the frequency of self-reported errors by fellows, and the primary independent variable was supervision scores. Questions also assessed barriers for effective faculty supervision. Results: One hundred seventy-six pediatric anesthesiology fellows were invited to participate, and 104 (59%) responded to the survey. Nine of 103 (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-16%) respondents reported performing procedures, on >1 occasion, for which they were not properly trained for. Thirteen of 101 (13%, 95% CI, 7%-21%) reported making >1 mistake with negative consequence to patients, and 23 of 104 (22%, 95% CI, 15%-31%) reported >1 medication error in the last year. There were no differences in median (interquartile range) supervision scores between fellows who reported >1 medication error compared to those reporting ≤1 errors (3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 3.4 [3.1-3.7]; median difference, 0; 99% CI, -0.3 to 0.3; P = .96). Similarly, there were no differences in those who reported >1 mistake with negative patient consequences, 3.3 (3.0-3.7), compared with those who did not report mistakes with negative patient consequences (3.4 [3.3-3.7]; median difference, 0.1; 99% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .35). Conclusions: We detected a high rate of self-reported medication errors in pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. Interestingly, fellows' perception of quality of faculty supervision was not associated with the frequency of reported errors. The current results with a narrow CI suggest the need to evaluate other potential factors that can be associated with the high frequency of reported errors by pediatric fellows (eg, fatigue, burnout). The identification of factors that lead to medical errors by pediatric anesthesiology fellows should be a main research priority to improve both trainee education and best practices of pediatric anesthesia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048097966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048097966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002445

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002445

M3 - Article

C2 - 28863019

AN - SCOPUS:85048097966

VL - 126

SP - 639

EP - 643

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 2

ER -