Pediatric heart transplant recipients bridged with biventricular assist device have worse 1 year graft survival

Kae Watanabe*, Anna Joong, Philip T. Thrush, Nina Srdanovic, Michael C. Monge, Elfriede Pahl

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There are little data on postheart transplant (HT) outcomes for pediatric patients that were supported to HT with biventricular assist device (BiVAD). The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for patients <18 years old at time of HT between January 2005 and March 2018, excluding patients bridged with total artificial hearts and right ventricular assist device (VAD). Of 4,904 pediatric HT recipients, patients were grouped by no VAD support (3,934; 80.2%), left ventricular assist device only (736; 15%), and BiVAD (234; 4.8%). Overall graft survival analysis indicates crossing hazard rates between groups over time with the BiVAD group having a significantly lower graft survival at 1 year post-HT. A Cox model adjusted for age, era, diagnosis, and time by group interaction demonstrated increased 1 year hazard ratio (HR) of 8.5 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 6.15-11.79) comparing BiVAD to no VAD. Comparable hazard between BiVAD and no VAD groups were found at 5 years (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.67-1.51), while lower hazard for the BiVAD group was found at 10 years post-HT (HR 0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.18). Although pre-HT BiVAD support leads to worse graft survival 1 year post-HT, long-term survival is acceptable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1329-1334
Number of pages6
JournalASAIO Journal
Volume67
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2021

Keywords

  • Biventricular assist device
  • Pediatric ventricular assist device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pediatric heart transplant recipients bridged with biventricular assist device have worse 1 year graft survival'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this