TY - JOUR
T1 - Pediatric Intensivist and Pediatric Neurologist Perspectives and Practices on Death by Neurologic Criteria
AU - JMataya, Leslie
AU - Ross, Lainie Friedman
AU - Ghavam, Ahmeneh
AU - Paquette, Erin Talati
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2021 The Journal of Clinical Ethics. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Controversies surrounding the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), also known as brain death, have become increasingly common over the last decade, occasionally leading to parental refusal of all or part of an evaluation or declaration of DNC. We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric neurologists and intensivists who participate in professional listservs to ascertain perspectives and practices concerning the evaluation of DNC, specifically on obtaining permission for evaluations and managing refusals. Of the 334 respondents who had performed an evaluation for DNC, 35 percent reported they had experienced at least one parental refusal, and 64.4 percent reported that they did not seek permission to perform an evaluation. Pediatric neurologists, careproviders who had less experience doing evaluations, and careproviders who had experienced parental refusal of an evaluation were more likely to obtain permission from parents. Most (80.8 percent) of respondents reported that their institution had a DNC policy. We found variability in many aspects of DNC evaluations and declarations, as well as the handling of refusals. Lack of consistency may make it more difficult for careproviders and families. Greater understanding of parental refusal of DNC evaluation is essential to inform efforts to increase consistency.
AB - Controversies surrounding the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), also known as brain death, have become increasingly common over the last decade, occasionally leading to parental refusal of all or part of an evaluation or declaration of DNC. We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric neurologists and intensivists who participate in professional listservs to ascertain perspectives and practices concerning the evaluation of DNC, specifically on obtaining permission for evaluations and managing refusals. Of the 334 respondents who had performed an evaluation for DNC, 35 percent reported they had experienced at least one parental refusal, and 64.4 percent reported that they did not seek permission to perform an evaluation. Pediatric neurologists, careproviders who had less experience doing evaluations, and careproviders who had experienced parental refusal of an evaluation were more likely to obtain permission from parents. Most (80.8 percent) of respondents reported that their institution had a DNC policy. We found variability in many aspects of DNC evaluations and declarations, as well as the handling of refusals. Lack of consistency may make it more difficult for careproviders and families. Greater understanding of parental refusal of DNC evaluation is essential to inform efforts to increase consistency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116802559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116802559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 34548428
AN - SCOPUS:85116802559
SN - 1046-7890
VL - 32
SP - 195
EP - 205
JO - The Journal of clinical ethics
JF - The Journal of clinical ethics
IS - 3
ER -