Pediatric Surgical Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review

Dabin Ji, Steven L. Goudy, Mehul V Raval, Nikhila Raol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Pediatric surgical risk assessment tools use patient- and procedure-specific variables to predict postoperative complications. These tools assist clinicians in preoperative counseling and surgical decision-making. The objective of this systematic literature review was to compile and compare existing pediatric surgical risk tools that are broadly applicable across pediatric surgical specialties. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant publications were identified and screened based on predefined eligibility criteria: (1) a preoperative risk assessment tool predicting postoperative complications or mortality, (2) applicable across various surgical specialties, and (3) pertinent to the pediatric population. Studies with specialty- or procedure-specific risk scores and validation studies were excluded. Included articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias by using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Risk factors were evaluated across the models as proxies for operative suitability of patients before surgery. Risk factors common to all studies were the presence of cardiovascular or neurological diseases and history of prematurity. Three of the four included studies defined most risk factors in binary terms, whereas one study used a scale of severity of organ system disease when defining preoperative risk. Generated risk score models provided good to strong concordance with inpatient mortality or postoperative complications, with c-statistic values ranging from 0.77 to 0.98. Conclusions: Each study reported an assessment of a novel, generally applicable pediatric surgical risk assessment tool for risk-stratifying children preoperatively for complications that rise after surgery. More studies are needed to assess generalizability in all populations and procedures.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages277-282
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume234
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Surgical Specialties
Mortality
Validation Studies
Proxy
Population
Publications
Counseling
Inpatients
Decision Making
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Pediatrics
  • Postoperative complications
  • Risk assessment
  • Risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Ji, Dabin ; Goudy, Steven L. ; Raval, Mehul V ; Raol, Nikhila. / Pediatric Surgical Risk Assessment Tools : A Systematic Review. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2019 ; Vol. 234. pp. 277-282.
@article{67d6a398bab24c13ba241326df74279f,
title = "Pediatric Surgical Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Background: Pediatric surgical risk assessment tools use patient- and procedure-specific variables to predict postoperative complications. These tools assist clinicians in preoperative counseling and surgical decision-making. The objective of this systematic literature review was to compile and compare existing pediatric surgical risk tools that are broadly applicable across pediatric surgical specialties. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant publications were identified and screened based on predefined eligibility criteria: (1) a preoperative risk assessment tool predicting postoperative complications or mortality, (2) applicable across various surgical specialties, and (3) pertinent to the pediatric population. Studies with specialty- or procedure-specific risk scores and validation studies were excluded. Included articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias by using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Risk factors were evaluated across the models as proxies for operative suitability of patients before surgery. Risk factors common to all studies were the presence of cardiovascular or neurological diseases and history of prematurity. Three of the four included studies defined most risk factors in binary terms, whereas one study used a scale of severity of organ system disease when defining preoperative risk. Generated risk score models provided good to strong concordance with inpatient mortality or postoperative complications, with c-statistic values ranging from 0.77 to 0.98. Conclusions: Each study reported an assessment of a novel, generally applicable pediatric surgical risk assessment tool for risk-stratifying children preoperatively for complications that rise after surgery. More studies are needed to assess generalizability in all populations and procedures.",
keywords = "Pediatrics, Postoperative complications, Risk assessment, Risk factors",
author = "Dabin Ji and Goudy, {Steven L.} and Raval, {Mehul V} and Nikhila Raol",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "234",
pages = "277--282",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Pediatric Surgical Risk Assessment Tools : A Systematic Review. / Ji, Dabin; Goudy, Steven L.; Raval, Mehul V; Raol, Nikhila.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 234, 01.02.2019, p. 277-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pediatric Surgical Risk Assessment Tools

T2 - Journal of Surgical Research

AU - Ji, Dabin

AU - Goudy, Steven L.

AU - Raval, Mehul V

AU - Raol, Nikhila

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Background: Pediatric surgical risk assessment tools use patient- and procedure-specific variables to predict postoperative complications. These tools assist clinicians in preoperative counseling and surgical decision-making. The objective of this systematic literature review was to compile and compare existing pediatric surgical risk tools that are broadly applicable across pediatric surgical specialties. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant publications were identified and screened based on predefined eligibility criteria: (1) a preoperative risk assessment tool predicting postoperative complications or mortality, (2) applicable across various surgical specialties, and (3) pertinent to the pediatric population. Studies with specialty- or procedure-specific risk scores and validation studies were excluded. Included articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias by using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Risk factors were evaluated across the models as proxies for operative suitability of patients before surgery. Risk factors common to all studies were the presence of cardiovascular or neurological diseases and history of prematurity. Three of the four included studies defined most risk factors in binary terms, whereas one study used a scale of severity of organ system disease when defining preoperative risk. Generated risk score models provided good to strong concordance with inpatient mortality or postoperative complications, with c-statistic values ranging from 0.77 to 0.98. Conclusions: Each study reported an assessment of a novel, generally applicable pediatric surgical risk assessment tool for risk-stratifying children preoperatively for complications that rise after surgery. More studies are needed to assess generalizability in all populations and procedures.

AB - Background: Pediatric surgical risk assessment tools use patient- and procedure-specific variables to predict postoperative complications. These tools assist clinicians in preoperative counseling and surgical decision-making. The objective of this systematic literature review was to compile and compare existing pediatric surgical risk tools that are broadly applicable across pediatric surgical specialties. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant publications were identified and screened based on predefined eligibility criteria: (1) a preoperative risk assessment tool predicting postoperative complications or mortality, (2) applicable across various surgical specialties, and (3) pertinent to the pediatric population. Studies with specialty- or procedure-specific risk scores and validation studies were excluded. Included articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias by using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Risk factors were evaluated across the models as proxies for operative suitability of patients before surgery. Risk factors common to all studies were the presence of cardiovascular or neurological diseases and history of prematurity. Three of the four included studies defined most risk factors in binary terms, whereas one study used a scale of severity of organ system disease when defining preoperative risk. Generated risk score models provided good to strong concordance with inpatient mortality or postoperative complications, with c-statistic values ranging from 0.77 to 0.98. Conclusions: Each study reported an assessment of a novel, generally applicable pediatric surgical risk assessment tool for risk-stratifying children preoperatively for complications that rise after surgery. More studies are needed to assess generalizability in all populations and procedures.

KW - Pediatrics

KW - Postoperative complications

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055181156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055181156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.051

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.051

M3 - Article

VL - 234

SP - 277

EP - 282

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

ER -