TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceived low-quality communication is not associated with greater frequency of requests for ethics consultation
T2 - Null findings from an empirical study
AU - Volpe, Rebecca L.
AU - Benrud, Jacob
AU - Gordon, Elisa J.
AU - Green, Michael J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Background: Prior research has explored reasons why health care providers may or may not choose to seek an ethics consultation. Although low-quality communication is evident in many ethics consultations, it is unknown whether poor communication in clinical settings is related to health care providers' requests for ethics involvement. Objective: To assess the relationship between self-reported ratings of health care providers' inter- and intraprofessional communication and ethics consultation requests. Method: This cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire of physicians and nurses in six intensive care units at one academic medical center in the United States. The questionnaire assessed perceptions about requesting ethics consultations and how health care providers perceive communication. Results: Two hundred sixty-two participants (228 nurses and 34 physicians) responded to the survey (response rate 55%; 59% for nurses and 41% for physicians). Requests for an ethics consult were positively associated with perceived quality of interprofessional communication (r =.13, p <.05), but perceptions of the number of ethical dilemmas that occur on participants' units each month were negatively associated with the perceived quality of intra-professional communication (r = −.17, p <.01). Conclusion: The relationship that was hypothesized between perceived poor communication and increased number of ethics consultations was not borne out by these data. Indeed, we found the opposite; these finding suggests that good inter- and intraprofessional communication may promote the use of outside resources, such as ethics, when they are needed.
AB - Background: Prior research has explored reasons why health care providers may or may not choose to seek an ethics consultation. Although low-quality communication is evident in many ethics consultations, it is unknown whether poor communication in clinical settings is related to health care providers' requests for ethics involvement. Objective: To assess the relationship between self-reported ratings of health care providers' inter- and intraprofessional communication and ethics consultation requests. Method: This cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire of physicians and nurses in six intensive care units at one academic medical center in the United States. The questionnaire assessed perceptions about requesting ethics consultations and how health care providers perceive communication. Results: Two hundred sixty-two participants (228 nurses and 34 physicians) responded to the survey (response rate 55%; 59% for nurses and 41% for physicians). Requests for an ethics consult were positively associated with perceived quality of interprofessional communication (r =.13, p <.05), but perceptions of the number of ethical dilemmas that occur on participants' units each month were negatively associated with the perceived quality of intra-professional communication (r = −.17, p <.01). Conclusion: The relationship that was hypothesized between perceived poor communication and increased number of ethics consultations was not borne out by these data. Indeed, we found the opposite; these finding suggests that good inter- and intraprofessional communication may promote the use of outside resources, such as ethics, when they are needed.
KW - clinical ethics consultation
KW - critical care
KW - health care providers
KW - interprofessional communication
KW - intraprofessional communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989244125&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989244125&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23294515.2016.1229699
DO - 10.1080/23294515.2016.1229699
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84989244125
SN - 2329-4515
VL - 7
SP - 235
EP - 239
JO - AJOB Empirical Bioethics
JF - AJOB Empirical Bioethics
IS - 4
ER -