Performing procedures on the newly deceased

Herbert Rakatansky, Frank A. Riddick, Leonard J. Morse, John M. O'Bannon, Michael S. Goldrich, Priscilla Ray, Matthew Weiss, Robert M. Sade, Monique A. Spillman, Karine Morin*, Audiey Kao, Andrew H. Maixner, Samuel C. Seiden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations


The report explores whether it is necessary to obtain informed consent before training procedures can be performed on the newly dead, weighing two conflicting considerations: the importance of protecting the integrity of the newly deceased with respect to family, society, and profession, and the need to educate health care providers. The report considers arguments against the need for consent, namely the benefit of having well-trained physicians, the contention that alternative models for teaching are inadequate, and the concerns that if consent were required, it rarely would be granted. These considerations are weighed against the value of respecting the sensitivities not only of families but also of medical teams, and the importance of preserving trust in the medical profession. The report concludes that performing procedures on the newly dead must proceed not randomly but rather in the context of a structured training sequence completed under close supervision, and recommends that physicians request permission from family members before performing such procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1212-1216
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Issue number12 I
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education


Dive into the research topics of 'Performing procedures on the newly deceased'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this