TY - JOUR
T1 - Peripheral blood eosinophilia, hyperimmunoglobulinemia A and fatigue
T2 - Possible complications following rupture of silicone breast implants
AU - Levenson, Toby
AU - Greenberger, Paul A.
AU - Murphy, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Ernest S. Bazley Grant to Northwestern Memorial Hospital and the North-western University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.
PY - 1996/8
Y1 - 1996/8
N2 - Background: Silicone breast implantation has been considered quite safe and of major cosmetic value. Immunologic sequelae such as collagen vascular diseases have not been confirmed in large studies. Objective: We describe a 55-year-old woman who developed severe fatigue, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and hyperimmunoglobulinemia A after rapture of a silicone breast implant during closed manual manipulation to lyse fibrotic tissue. Methods: We charted evidence for eosinophilia over a 19-year period and determined quantitative immunoglobulins, and lymphocyte subsets by FACS analysis. Results: Peripheral eosinophilia in 1976 was 693/mm3 and increased to 1360/mm3 after rupture of the implant in 1992. Serum immunoglobulin A was 332 mg/dL in 1976 and ranged after rapture from 473 to 627 mg/dL without other cause. Fatigue was not reversed with a parenteral corticosteroid injection. CD4 and CD8 subsets were normal but 40% of CD3 cells were Ia positive although not CD25 positive (IL2 receptor). Only 5% of cells were CD19 CD23 positive despite the high concentration of serum IgA. Conclusion: This case is an example of a previously unreported apparent adverse effect of silicone-breast implant rupture with persisting eosinophilia, hyperimmunoglobulinemia A, and fatigue.
AB - Background: Silicone breast implantation has been considered quite safe and of major cosmetic value. Immunologic sequelae such as collagen vascular diseases have not been confirmed in large studies. Objective: We describe a 55-year-old woman who developed severe fatigue, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and hyperimmunoglobulinemia A after rapture of a silicone breast implant during closed manual manipulation to lyse fibrotic tissue. Methods: We charted evidence for eosinophilia over a 19-year period and determined quantitative immunoglobulins, and lymphocyte subsets by FACS analysis. Results: Peripheral eosinophilia in 1976 was 693/mm3 and increased to 1360/mm3 after rupture of the implant in 1992. Serum immunoglobulin A was 332 mg/dL in 1976 and ranged after rapture from 473 to 627 mg/dL without other cause. Fatigue was not reversed with a parenteral corticosteroid injection. CD4 and CD8 subsets were normal but 40% of CD3 cells were Ia positive although not CD25 positive (IL2 receptor). Only 5% of cells were CD19 CD23 positive despite the high concentration of serum IgA. Conclusion: This case is an example of a previously unreported apparent adverse effect of silicone-breast implant rupture with persisting eosinophilia, hyperimmunoglobulinemia A, and fatigue.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029815596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029815596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63497-7
DO - 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63497-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 8760777
AN - SCOPUS:0029815596
SN - 1081-1206
VL - 77
SP - 119
EP - 122
JO - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
JF - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
IS - 2
ER -