Personal characteristics of house staff candidates: A quantitative analysis of relative weights

M. A. Greganti, W. C. McGaghie, W. F. Finn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


We surveyed the faculty, fellows, and residents of a department of medicine to determine the relative importance of each of eight personal characteristics evaluated during the interview of house staff candidates. A booklet containing all possible pairings of the eight characteristics was distributed to 219 participants who were asked which member of each pair should have greater weight for assigning an overall interview grade. Usable data were returned by 172 persons (79%) and analyzed by the psychometric scaling method of paired comparisons. The four characteristics with the greatest relative weights were professional attitude, maturity, enthusiasm and energy, and knowledge. The faculty, fellows, and residents were highly consistent in their judgments. However, three of the characteristics (motivation for clinical practice, knowledge, and verbal skill) significantly distinguished the three departmental groups. These results show the utility of the paired comparison method for identifying a department's weighting of variables for selection of house staff.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-111
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Personal characteristics of house staff candidates: A quantitative analysis of relative weights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this