Perspectives on the ecology of decision modes: Reply to comments

Will M. Bennis, Douglas L. Medin, Daniel M. Bartels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


We welcome and appreciate the insights and perspectives provided by Schwartz (2010, this issue), Tetlock and Mitchell (2010, this issue), and Bazerman and Greene (2010, this issue). Our thinking has benefited considerably from their responses, and we appreciate the opportunity to continue the discussion. In our reply, we address issues concerning the scope of moral rules and of cost-benefit analysis (CBA), including their relation to other decision modes. We then revisit the issue of closed-world assumptions (CWAs) and the question of how learning processes may operate for different decision modes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-215
Number of pages3
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectives on the ecology of decision modes: Reply to comments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this