TY - JOUR
T1 - Perspectives on the ecology of decision modes
T2 - Reply to comments
AU - Bennis, Will M.
AU - Medin, Douglas L.
AU - Bartels, Daniel M.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - We welcome and appreciate the insights and perspectives provided by Schwartz (2010, this issue), Tetlock and Mitchell (2010, this issue), and Bazerman and Greene (2010, this issue). Our thinking has benefited considerably from their responses, and we appreciate the opportunity to continue the discussion. In our reply, we address issues concerning the scope of moral rules and of cost-benefit analysis (CBA), including their relation to other decision modes. We then revisit the issue of closed-world assumptions (CWAs) and the question of how learning processes may operate for different decision modes.
AB - We welcome and appreciate the insights and perspectives provided by Schwartz (2010, this issue), Tetlock and Mitchell (2010, this issue), and Bazerman and Greene (2010, this issue). Our thinking has benefited considerably from their responses, and we appreciate the opportunity to continue the discussion. In our reply, we address issues concerning the scope of moral rules and of cost-benefit analysis (CBA), including their relation to other decision modes. We then revisit the issue of closed-world assumptions (CWAs) and the question of how learning processes may operate for different decision modes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955383524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955383524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1745691610362363
DO - 10.1177/1745691610362363
M3 - Article
C2 - 26162129
AN - SCOPUS:79955383524
SN - 1745-6916
VL - 5
SP - 213
EP - 215
JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science
JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science
IS - 2
ER -