Abstract
Agricultural intensification can negatively affect farmer and social welfare through health and environmental externalities if producers have imperfect knowledge of the risks posed by agricultural inputs. This paper explores the effects of health-risk information on the demand for substitutes in the pesticides market and farmer preferences for risk-mitigating technologies using a choice experiment integrated with a randomized controlled trial in Zambia. Environmental health-risk information provided through a farmer training program had an insignificant effect on demand for risk-mitigating personal protective equipment but a significant effect on demand for substitutes, lower toxicity pesticides. The treatment group was twice as likely to substitute a highly toxic pesticide with a low toxicity pesticide after receiving training. What farmers do not know can hurt them and the environment through lower demand for less risky and less damaging substitutes.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 801-836 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
Funding
Financial support for this research was provided by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Borlaug Fellows Program. We are grateful for collaboration and support from our field team in Zambia led by Remy Kasonteka, as well as support from the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock led by Diana Simbotwe. This research also benefited greatly from comments from Scott Swinton and feedback from the editor and anonymous reviewers. Tyler Box provided excellent research assistance. Michigan State University Institutional Review Board nos. x14-1080e, i047252.
Keywords
- Becker-DeGroot-Marschak
- Choice experiment
- Exposure
- Information
- RCT
- Toxicity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law