TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase 2B randomized study of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and severe pruritus
AU - Silverberg, Jonathan I.
AU - Pinter, Andreas
AU - Pulka, Grazyna
AU - Poulin, Yves
AU - Bouaziz, Jean David
AU - Wollenberg, Andreas
AU - Murrell, Dédée F.
AU - Alexis, Andrew
AU - Lindsey, Lisa
AU - Ahmad, Faiz
AU - Piketty, Christophe
AU - Clucas, Alan
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by Nestlé Skin Health-Galderma R&D . The funders participated in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting and critical revision of the report and provided approval to submit.
Funding Information:
The study was funded by Nestlé Skin Health-Galderma R&D. The funders participated in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting and critical revision of the report and provided approval to submit.Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: J. I. Silverberg has received honoraria as a speaker/consultant for Galderma, Abbvie, AnaptysBio, Asana, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Kiniksa, Leo, Menlo, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi, and Realm and has received grants as an investigator from Galderma and GlaxoSmithKline. A. Pinter has received compensation as an investigator, speaker, or advisor from AbbVie, Allmirall-Hermal, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Hexal, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Medac, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Tigercat Pharma, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Schering-Plous, and UCB Pharma. Y. Poulin has received grants as an investigator for Galderma, Abbvie, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bond Avillion, Celgene, Devonian, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck Serono, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. A. Wollenberg has received grants, personal fees, and/or nonfinancial support from Almirall, Beiersdorf, Bioderma, Chugai, Galapagos, Galderma, Hans Karrer, Leo Pharma, Eli Lilly, L'Oreal, Maruho, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Santen, and Sanofi-Aventis. D. F. Murrell has received grants as investigator and honoraria as advisor for Galderma, Sanofi, Anacor, Pfizer, Menlo, Pierre Fabre, and GlaxoSmithKline and has also served as an investigator for Regeneron and Medimmune. A. Alexis has served as an investigator and consultant for Galderma, Leo, Novartis, Almirall, Celgene, and Rxl; as an investigator for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Menlo, and SkinMedica; and as a consultant for Pfizer, Sanofi-Regeneron, Trevi, Dermavent, Unilever, BioPharmX, Cipla, Beiersdorf, Valeant, L'Oreal, and P&G. L. Lindsey, F. Ahmad, C. Piketty, and A. Clucas are or were employees of Galderma at the time of the study. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Background: Nemolizumab targets the IL-31 receptor α subunit involved in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis. Objective: We sought to evaluate a new dosing strategy of nemolizumab in patients with AD. Methods: We performed a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of nemolizumab (10, 30, and 90 mg) subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks versus placebo, with topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, severe pruritus, and inadequate control with topical treatment (n = 226). The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the peak pruritus (PP) numeric rating scale (NRS), and the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) were assessed. Standard safety assessments were performed. Results: Nemolizumab improved EASI, IGA, and/or NRS-itch scores, with the 30-mg dose being most effective. Nemolizumab (30 mg) reduced EASI scores versus placebo at week 24 (−68.8% vs −52.1%, P = .016); significant differences were observed by week 8 (P ≤ .01). With significant improvement (P = .028) as early as week 4, IGA 0/1 rates were higher for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (33.3% vs 12.3%, P = .008) but not week 24 because of an increased placebo/topical corticosteroid effect (36.8% vs 21.1%, P = .06). PP-NRS scores were improved for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (−68.6% vs −34.3%, P < .0001) and week 24 (−67.3% vs −35.8%, P < .0001), with a difference by week 1 (P < .001). NRS response rates (≥4-point decrease) were greater for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (P ≤ .001) and week 24 (P ≤ .01). Nemolizumab was safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. Conclusions: Nemolizumab resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in cutaneous signs of inflammation and pruritus in patients with AD, with maximal efficacy observed at 30 mg. Nemolizumab had an acceptable safety profile.
AB - Background: Nemolizumab targets the IL-31 receptor α subunit involved in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis. Objective: We sought to evaluate a new dosing strategy of nemolizumab in patients with AD. Methods: We performed a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of nemolizumab (10, 30, and 90 mg) subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks versus placebo, with topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, severe pruritus, and inadequate control with topical treatment (n = 226). The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the peak pruritus (PP) numeric rating scale (NRS), and the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) were assessed. Standard safety assessments were performed. Results: Nemolizumab improved EASI, IGA, and/or NRS-itch scores, with the 30-mg dose being most effective. Nemolizumab (30 mg) reduced EASI scores versus placebo at week 24 (−68.8% vs −52.1%, P = .016); significant differences were observed by week 8 (P ≤ .01). With significant improvement (P = .028) as early as week 4, IGA 0/1 rates were higher for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (33.3% vs 12.3%, P = .008) but not week 24 because of an increased placebo/topical corticosteroid effect (36.8% vs 21.1%, P = .06). PP-NRS scores were improved for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (−68.6% vs −34.3%, P < .0001) and week 24 (−67.3% vs −35.8%, P < .0001), with a difference by week 1 (P < .001). NRS response rates (≥4-point decrease) were greater for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (P ≤ .001) and week 24 (P ≤ .01). Nemolizumab was safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. Conclusions: Nemolizumab resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in cutaneous signs of inflammation and pruritus in patients with AD, with maximal efficacy observed at 30 mg. Nemolizumab had an acceptable safety profile.
KW - Atopic dermatitis
KW - anti–IL-31 receptor
KW - humanized mAb
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072615978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072615978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 31449914
AN - SCOPUS:85072615978
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 145
SP - 173
EP - 182
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 1
ER -