Philosophy and rhetoric in Lincoln's First Inaugural Address

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Lincoln's First Inaugural Address was not designed to coax the seceded states back into the Union, because he never conceded that they had left. Rather, he sought to define the situation so that, if war broke out, the seceders would be cast as the aggressors and the federal government as acting in self-defense. To this end, he presented a principled case against the legitimacy or even possibility of secession while applying the arguments to the exigence at hand. He identifies the cause of the trouble as "unwarranted apprehension" among the southern states, announces his policy as a minimalist assertion of national sovereignty, and urges that disaffected southerners not act in haste to threaten that sovereignty further. Not only does he explicitly call for slowing down the push to war but the speech itself enacts a slowing of time. In sum, the First Inaugural illustrates both Lincoln's philosophical grounding and his rhetorical dexterity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-188
Number of pages24
JournalPhilosophy and Rhetoric
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 21 2012

Fingerprint

Inaugural
Philosophy
Sovereignty
Rhetoric
Self-defense
Legitimacy
Apprehension
Grounding
Federal Government
Causes
Secession

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{bcd8079427bc4cadb7cf247265b43531,
title = "Philosophy and rhetoric in Lincoln's First Inaugural Address",
abstract = "Lincoln's First Inaugural Address was not designed to coax the seceded states back into the Union, because he never conceded that they had left. Rather, he sought to define the situation so that, if war broke out, the seceders would be cast as the aggressors and the federal government as acting in self-defense. To this end, he presented a principled case against the legitimacy or even possibility of secession while applying the arguments to the exigence at hand. He identifies the cause of the trouble as {"}unwarranted apprehension{"} among the southern states, announces his policy as a minimalist assertion of national sovereignty, and urges that disaffected southerners not act in haste to threaten that sovereignty further. Not only does he explicitly call for slowing down the push to war but the speech itself enacts a slowing of time. In sum, the First Inaugural illustrates both Lincoln's philosophical grounding and his rhetorical dexterity.",
author = "Zarefsky, {David H}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1353/par.2012.0009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "165--188",
journal = "Philosophy and Rhetoric",
issn = "0031-8213",
publisher = "Penn State University Press",
number = "2",

}

Philosophy and rhetoric in Lincoln's First Inaugural Address. / Zarefsky, David H.

In: Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 45, No. 2, 21.05.2012, p. 165-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Philosophy and rhetoric in Lincoln's First Inaugural Address

AU - Zarefsky, David H

PY - 2012/5/21

Y1 - 2012/5/21

N2 - Lincoln's First Inaugural Address was not designed to coax the seceded states back into the Union, because he never conceded that they had left. Rather, he sought to define the situation so that, if war broke out, the seceders would be cast as the aggressors and the federal government as acting in self-defense. To this end, he presented a principled case against the legitimacy or even possibility of secession while applying the arguments to the exigence at hand. He identifies the cause of the trouble as "unwarranted apprehension" among the southern states, announces his policy as a minimalist assertion of national sovereignty, and urges that disaffected southerners not act in haste to threaten that sovereignty further. Not only does he explicitly call for slowing down the push to war but the speech itself enacts a slowing of time. In sum, the First Inaugural illustrates both Lincoln's philosophical grounding and his rhetorical dexterity.

AB - Lincoln's First Inaugural Address was not designed to coax the seceded states back into the Union, because he never conceded that they had left. Rather, he sought to define the situation so that, if war broke out, the seceders would be cast as the aggressors and the federal government as acting in self-defense. To this end, he presented a principled case against the legitimacy or even possibility of secession while applying the arguments to the exigence at hand. He identifies the cause of the trouble as "unwarranted apprehension" among the southern states, announces his policy as a minimalist assertion of national sovereignty, and urges that disaffected southerners not act in haste to threaten that sovereignty further. Not only does he explicitly call for slowing down the push to war but the speech itself enacts a slowing of time. In sum, the First Inaugural illustrates both Lincoln's philosophical grounding and his rhetorical dexterity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861019684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861019684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/par.2012.0009

DO - 10.1353/par.2012.0009

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 165

EP - 188

JO - Philosophy and Rhetoric

JF - Philosophy and Rhetoric

SN - 0031-8213

IS - 2

ER -