Phonological facilitation of object naming in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

Jennifer E Mack, Soojin Cho-Reyes, James D. Kloet, Sandra Weintraub, Marek-Marsel Mesulam, Cynthia K Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Phonological processing deficits are characteristic of both the agrammatic and logopenic subtypes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA-G and PPA-L). However, it is an open question which substages of phonological processing (i.e., phonological word form retrieval, phonological encoding) are impaired in these subtypes of PPA, as well as how phonological processing deficits contribute to anomia. In the present study, participants with PPA-G (n = 7), participants with PPA-L (n = 7), and unimpaired controls (n = 17) named objects as interfering written words (phonologically related/unrelated) were presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 0, +100, +300, and +500 ms. Phonological facilitation (PF) effects (faster naming times with phonologically related interfering words) were found for the controls and PPA-L group only at SOA = 0 and +100 ms. However, the PPA-G group exhibited protracted PF effects (PF at SOA = 0, +100, and +300 ms). These results may reflect deficits in phonological encoding in PPA-G, but not in PPA-L, supporting the neuropsychological reality of this substage of phonological processing and the distinction between these two PPA subtypes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)172-193
Number of pages22
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013

Fingerprint

Primary Progressive Aphasia
Phonological Facilitation
Object Naming
Anomia

Keywords

  • Anomia
  • Phonological processing
  • Picture-word interference paradigm
  • Primary progressive aphasia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{5f8299931eb54a46bb79e3404383b649,
title = "Phonological facilitation of object naming in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia (PPA)",
abstract = "Phonological processing deficits are characteristic of both the agrammatic and logopenic subtypes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA-G and PPA-L). However, it is an open question which substages of phonological processing (i.e., phonological word form retrieval, phonological encoding) are impaired in these subtypes of PPA, as well as how phonological processing deficits contribute to anomia. In the present study, participants with PPA-G (n = 7), participants with PPA-L (n = 7), and unimpaired controls (n = 17) named objects as interfering written words (phonologically related/unrelated) were presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 0, +100, +300, and +500 ms. Phonological facilitation (PF) effects (faster naming times with phonologically related interfering words) were found for the controls and PPA-L group only at SOA = 0 and +100 ms. However, the PPA-G group exhibited protracted PF effects (PF at SOA = 0, +100, and +300 ms). These results may reflect deficits in phonological encoding in PPA-G, but not in PPA-L, supporting the neuropsychological reality of this substage of phonological processing and the distinction between these two PPA subtypes.",
keywords = "Anomia, Phonological processing, Picture-word interference paradigm, Primary progressive aphasia",
author = "Mack, {Jennifer E} and Soojin Cho-Reyes and Kloet, {James D.} and Sandra Weintraub and Marek-Marsel Mesulam and Thompson, {Cynthia K}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02643294.2013.835717",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "172--193",
journal = "Cognitive Neuropsychology",
issn = "0264-3294",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Phonological facilitation of object naming in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia (PPA). / Mack, Jennifer E; Cho-Reyes, Soojin; Kloet, James D.; Weintraub, Sandra; Mesulam, Marek-Marsel; Thompson, Cynthia K.

In: Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.05.2013, p. 172-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phonological facilitation of object naming in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

AU - Mack, Jennifer E

AU - Cho-Reyes, Soojin

AU - Kloet, James D.

AU - Weintraub, Sandra

AU - Mesulam, Marek-Marsel

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - Phonological processing deficits are characteristic of both the agrammatic and logopenic subtypes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA-G and PPA-L). However, it is an open question which substages of phonological processing (i.e., phonological word form retrieval, phonological encoding) are impaired in these subtypes of PPA, as well as how phonological processing deficits contribute to anomia. In the present study, participants with PPA-G (n = 7), participants with PPA-L (n = 7), and unimpaired controls (n = 17) named objects as interfering written words (phonologically related/unrelated) were presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 0, +100, +300, and +500 ms. Phonological facilitation (PF) effects (faster naming times with phonologically related interfering words) were found for the controls and PPA-L group only at SOA = 0 and +100 ms. However, the PPA-G group exhibited protracted PF effects (PF at SOA = 0, +100, and +300 ms). These results may reflect deficits in phonological encoding in PPA-G, but not in PPA-L, supporting the neuropsychological reality of this substage of phonological processing and the distinction between these two PPA subtypes.

AB - Phonological processing deficits are characteristic of both the agrammatic and logopenic subtypes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA-G and PPA-L). However, it is an open question which substages of phonological processing (i.e., phonological word form retrieval, phonological encoding) are impaired in these subtypes of PPA, as well as how phonological processing deficits contribute to anomia. In the present study, participants with PPA-G (n = 7), participants with PPA-L (n = 7), and unimpaired controls (n = 17) named objects as interfering written words (phonologically related/unrelated) were presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 0, +100, +300, and +500 ms. Phonological facilitation (PF) effects (faster naming times with phonologically related interfering words) were found for the controls and PPA-L group only at SOA = 0 and +100 ms. However, the PPA-G group exhibited protracted PF effects (PF at SOA = 0, +100, and +300 ms). These results may reflect deficits in phonological encoding in PPA-G, but not in PPA-L, supporting the neuropsychological reality of this substage of phonological processing and the distinction between these two PPA subtypes.

KW - Anomia

KW - Phonological processing

KW - Picture-word interference paradigm

KW - Primary progressive aphasia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885384920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885384920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02643294.2013.835717

DO - 10.1080/02643294.2013.835717

M3 - Article

C2 - 24070176

AN - SCOPUS:84885384920

VL - 30

SP - 172

EP - 193

JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology

JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology

SN - 0264-3294

IS - 3

ER -