TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical mechanisms in hybrid additive manufacturing
T2 - A process design framework
AU - Webster, Samantha
AU - Lin, Hui
AU - Carter, Fred M.
AU - Ehmann, Kornel
AU - Cao, Jian
N1 - Funding Information:
SW would like to acknowledge the National Science Foundationfor the Graduate Fellowship (under Grant No. DGE-1842165) to allow her freely pursue her research interest; JC to the support of the Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship N00014-19-1-2642 for its encouragement and financial support for pursuing fundamental manufacturing science. The authors acknowledge support by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) – Center for Hierarchical Material Design (CHiMaD) under grant No.70NANB14H012and the National Science Foundation (NSF) – Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) under grant No.CPS/CMMI-1646592.
Funding Information:
SW would like to acknowledge the N ational Science Foundation for the Graduate Fellowship (under Grant No. DGE-1842165) to allow her freely pursue her research interest; JC to the support of the Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship N00014-19-1-2642 for its encouragement and financial support for pursuing fundamental manufacturing science. The authors acknowledge support by the National Institute of Standards and Technology ( NIST) – Center for Hierarchical Material Design ( CHiMaD) under grant No. 70NANB14H012 and the National Science Foundation ( NSF) – Cyber-Physical Systems ( CPS) under grant No. CPS/CMMI-1646592 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - This study defined hybrid additive manufacturing (AM) as “in-situ or series combination of an additive manufacturing process and secondary energy sources in which physical mechanisms are fundamentally altered/controlled to affect the resulting properties of material and/or part.” This definition includes in-situ secondary processes as well as process chains, and it is anchored in multi-physical mechanisms such that new hybrid-AM processes can be freely and systematically sought or invented through a systems approach epitomized by the “property – mechanism – energy source – hybrid-AM process (PMEH)” thought process. The sequence of driving forces in this framework are as such: desired material properties determine which mechanism is utilized and, in turn, the energy source to be applied, which ultimately defines the hybrid-AM process. The five unifying physical mechanisms that were identified in this study are: melt pool dynamics, microstructure development, stress state, surface evolution, and thermal gradients. Analysis of properties, mechanisms, energy sources, and processes was conducted on more than 100 papers, and the results ultimately show the effect of mechanisms on material properties. Mechanisms are further classified by energy source, which are in turn broken down by hybrid-AM process. Additionally, each mechanism was defined and reviewed in detail, highlighting the PMEH relationship for metal hybrid-AM materials. Further analysis compares reported mechanical property values for hybrid-AM processes to both AM only and wrought properties for 316 L, Alloy 718, and Titanium Gr 5. Finally, future directions of research as well as clear gaps in knowledge are identified, which includes lack of variety in utilized energy sources, lack of material diversity, process chain integration and improvement, and promising hybrid-AM processes. With the presented analysis and PMEH framework, it is determined that metal AM hybrid processes are well suited to address current problems and show promise in creating superior and versatile materials. Further growth in this field is expected to be exponential, and the developed PMEH framework will aid in framing these innovative processes.
AB - This study defined hybrid additive manufacturing (AM) as “in-situ or series combination of an additive manufacturing process and secondary energy sources in which physical mechanisms are fundamentally altered/controlled to affect the resulting properties of material and/or part.” This definition includes in-situ secondary processes as well as process chains, and it is anchored in multi-physical mechanisms such that new hybrid-AM processes can be freely and systematically sought or invented through a systems approach epitomized by the “property – mechanism – energy source – hybrid-AM process (PMEH)” thought process. The sequence of driving forces in this framework are as such: desired material properties determine which mechanism is utilized and, in turn, the energy source to be applied, which ultimately defines the hybrid-AM process. The five unifying physical mechanisms that were identified in this study are: melt pool dynamics, microstructure development, stress state, surface evolution, and thermal gradients. Analysis of properties, mechanisms, energy sources, and processes was conducted on more than 100 papers, and the results ultimately show the effect of mechanisms on material properties. Mechanisms are further classified by energy source, which are in turn broken down by hybrid-AM process. Additionally, each mechanism was defined and reviewed in detail, highlighting the PMEH relationship for metal hybrid-AM materials. Further analysis compares reported mechanical property values for hybrid-AM processes to both AM only and wrought properties for 316 L, Alloy 718, and Titanium Gr 5. Finally, future directions of research as well as clear gaps in knowledge are identified, which includes lack of variety in utilized energy sources, lack of material diversity, process chain integration and improvement, and promising hybrid-AM processes. With the presented analysis and PMEH framework, it is determined that metal AM hybrid processes are well suited to address current problems and show promise in creating superior and versatile materials. Further growth in this field is expected to be exponential, and the developed PMEH framework will aid in framing these innovative processes.
KW - Hybrid additive manufacturing
KW - Manufacturing process chains
KW - Metal additive manufacturing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100150813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100150813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117048
DO - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117048
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85100150813
SN - 0924-0136
VL - 291
JO - Journal of Materials Processing Technology
JF - Journal of Materials Processing Technology
M1 - 117048
ER -