Physician Perceptions of Patient Health: A Comparative Analysis between Urologist and Hospitalist Perceptions of Need for Inpatient Hospitalist Comanagement Following Radical Cystectomy

Jessica H. Hannick, William Adams, Jasmin Sandhu, Stephanie Kliethermes, Daniel J. Mazur, Joshua J. Meeks, Sabine Sobek, Christopher L. Coogan, Aliyah Sadaf, Marcus L. Quek, Elizabeth Schulwolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background/Aims: The morbidity of radical cystectomy remains high. A multidisciplinary approach utilizing hospitalist comanagement may improve outcomes. It is unclear what factors should be considered to determine which patients might benefit from this approach. We sought to determine if there are differences between the perceived need for co-management between urologists and hospitalists. Preoperative variables were analyzed to determine which factors might be associated with need for comanagement. Methods: A case-based survey was emailed to urologists and hospitalists at 3 academic institutions to investigate perceptions regarding need for inpatient medical comanagement of fictitious patients following cystectomy. Decisions were rated based on patient comorbidities, age, race, sex, cancer stage, neoadjuvant therapy, alcohol intake, performance status, and English literacy. A Wilcoxon rank sum test assessed each question for differences. A Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to assess whether the proportion of respondents who advocated for comanagement increased as Charlson comorbidity score increased. Results: The most significant determinant of need for postoperative comanagement was patients' comorbidities. Urologists and hospitalists did not differ significantly in beliefs regarding need for comanagement. Conclusion: The most important determining factor for comanagement was presence of comorbidities. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this multidisciplinary approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-15
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Urology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 2017

Fingerprint

Hospitalists
Cystectomy
Comorbidity
Inpatients
Physicians
Health
Nonparametric Statistics
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Chi-Square Distribution
Alcohols
Morbidity
Urologists
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Bladder neoplasm
  • Comanagement
  • Cystectomy
  • Hospitalist
  • Questionnaire
  • Survey
  • Urinary bladder tumors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Urology

Cite this

Hannick, Jessica H. ; Adams, William ; Sandhu, Jasmin ; Kliethermes, Stephanie ; Mazur, Daniel J. ; Meeks, Joshua J. ; Sobek, Sabine ; Coogan, Christopher L. ; Sadaf, Aliyah ; Quek, Marcus L. ; Schulwolf, Elizabeth. / Physician Perceptions of Patient Health : A Comparative Analysis between Urologist and Hospitalist Perceptions of Need for Inpatient Hospitalist Comanagement Following Radical Cystectomy. In: Current Urology. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 9-15.
@article{ce984d74f26244c888fd687b1eb398d5,
title = "Physician Perceptions of Patient Health: A Comparative Analysis between Urologist and Hospitalist Perceptions of Need for Inpatient Hospitalist Comanagement Following Radical Cystectomy",
abstract = "Background/Aims: The morbidity of radical cystectomy remains high. A multidisciplinary approach utilizing hospitalist comanagement may improve outcomes. It is unclear what factors should be considered to determine which patients might benefit from this approach. We sought to determine if there are differences between the perceived need for co-management between urologists and hospitalists. Preoperative variables were analyzed to determine which factors might be associated with need for comanagement. Methods: A case-based survey was emailed to urologists and hospitalists at 3 academic institutions to investigate perceptions regarding need for inpatient medical comanagement of fictitious patients following cystectomy. Decisions were rated based on patient comorbidities, age, race, sex, cancer stage, neoadjuvant therapy, alcohol intake, performance status, and English literacy. A Wilcoxon rank sum test assessed each question for differences. A Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to assess whether the proportion of respondents who advocated for comanagement increased as Charlson comorbidity score increased. Results: The most significant determinant of need for postoperative comanagement was patients' comorbidities. Urologists and hospitalists did not differ significantly in beliefs regarding need for comanagement. Conclusion: The most important determining factor for comanagement was presence of comorbidities. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this multidisciplinary approach.",
keywords = "Bladder cancer, Bladder neoplasm, Comanagement, Cystectomy, Hospitalist, Questionnaire, Survey, Urinary bladder tumors",
author = "Hannick, {Jessica H.} and William Adams and Jasmin Sandhu and Stephanie Kliethermes and Mazur, {Daniel J.} and Meeks, {Joshua J.} and Sabine Sobek and Coogan, {Christopher L.} and Aliyah Sadaf and Quek, {Marcus L.} and Elizabeth Schulwolf",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1159/000447188",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "9--15",
journal = "Current Urology",
issn = "1661-7649",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

Physician Perceptions of Patient Health : A Comparative Analysis between Urologist and Hospitalist Perceptions of Need for Inpatient Hospitalist Comanagement Following Radical Cystectomy. / Hannick, Jessica H.; Adams, William; Sandhu, Jasmin; Kliethermes, Stephanie; Mazur, Daniel J.; Meeks, Joshua J.; Sobek, Sabine; Coogan, Christopher L.; Sadaf, Aliyah; Quek, Marcus L.; Schulwolf, Elizabeth.

In: Current Urology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 30.11.2017, p. 9-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician Perceptions of Patient Health

T2 - A Comparative Analysis between Urologist and Hospitalist Perceptions of Need for Inpatient Hospitalist Comanagement Following Radical Cystectomy

AU - Hannick, Jessica H.

AU - Adams, William

AU - Sandhu, Jasmin

AU - Kliethermes, Stephanie

AU - Mazur, Daniel J.

AU - Meeks, Joshua J.

AU - Sobek, Sabine

AU - Coogan, Christopher L.

AU - Sadaf, Aliyah

AU - Quek, Marcus L.

AU - Schulwolf, Elizabeth

PY - 2017/11/30

Y1 - 2017/11/30

N2 - Background/Aims: The morbidity of radical cystectomy remains high. A multidisciplinary approach utilizing hospitalist comanagement may improve outcomes. It is unclear what factors should be considered to determine which patients might benefit from this approach. We sought to determine if there are differences between the perceived need for co-management between urologists and hospitalists. Preoperative variables were analyzed to determine which factors might be associated with need for comanagement. Methods: A case-based survey was emailed to urologists and hospitalists at 3 academic institutions to investigate perceptions regarding need for inpatient medical comanagement of fictitious patients following cystectomy. Decisions were rated based on patient comorbidities, age, race, sex, cancer stage, neoadjuvant therapy, alcohol intake, performance status, and English literacy. A Wilcoxon rank sum test assessed each question for differences. A Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to assess whether the proportion of respondents who advocated for comanagement increased as Charlson comorbidity score increased. Results: The most significant determinant of need for postoperative comanagement was patients' comorbidities. Urologists and hospitalists did not differ significantly in beliefs regarding need for comanagement. Conclusion: The most important determining factor for comanagement was presence of comorbidities. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this multidisciplinary approach.

AB - Background/Aims: The morbidity of radical cystectomy remains high. A multidisciplinary approach utilizing hospitalist comanagement may improve outcomes. It is unclear what factors should be considered to determine which patients might benefit from this approach. We sought to determine if there are differences between the perceived need for co-management between urologists and hospitalists. Preoperative variables were analyzed to determine which factors might be associated with need for comanagement. Methods: A case-based survey was emailed to urologists and hospitalists at 3 academic institutions to investigate perceptions regarding need for inpatient medical comanagement of fictitious patients following cystectomy. Decisions were rated based on patient comorbidities, age, race, sex, cancer stage, neoadjuvant therapy, alcohol intake, performance status, and English literacy. A Wilcoxon rank sum test assessed each question for differences. A Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to assess whether the proportion of respondents who advocated for comanagement increased as Charlson comorbidity score increased. Results: The most significant determinant of need for postoperative comanagement was patients' comorbidities. Urologists and hospitalists did not differ significantly in beliefs regarding need for comanagement. Conclusion: The most important determining factor for comanagement was presence of comorbidities. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this multidisciplinary approach.

KW - Bladder cancer

KW - Bladder neoplasm

KW - Comanagement

KW - Cystectomy

KW - Hospitalist

KW - Questionnaire

KW - Survey

KW - Urinary bladder tumors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044785610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044785610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000447188

DO - 10.1159/000447188

M3 - Article

C2 - 29463971

AN - SCOPUS:85044785610

VL - 11

SP - 9

EP - 15

JO - Current Urology

JF - Current Urology

SN - 1661-7649

IS - 1

ER -