TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiological and computed tomographic predictors of outcome from lung volume reduction surgery
AU - Washko, George R.
AU - Martinez, Fernando J.
AU - Hoffman, Eric A.
AU - Loring, Stephen H.
AU - Estépar, Raúl San José
AU - Diaz, Alejandro A.
AU - Sciurba, Frank C.
AU - Silverman, Edwin K.
AU - Han, Meilan K.
AU - DeCamp, Malcolm
AU - Reilly, John J.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/3/1
Y1 - 2010/3/1
N2 - Rationale: Previous investigations have identified several potential predictors of outcomes from lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). A concern regarding these studies has been their small sample size, which may limit generalizability. We therefore sought to examine radiographic and physiologic predictors of surgical outcomes in a large, multicenter clinical investigation, the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. Objectives: To identify objective radiographic and physiological indices of lung disease that have prognostic value in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease being evaluated for LVRS. Methods: A subset of the subjects undergoing LVRS in the National EmphysemaTreatment Trialunderwent preoperativehigh-resolution computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the chest and measures of static lung recoil at total lung capacity (SRTLC) and inspiratory resistance (RI). The relationship between CT measures of emphysema, the ratio of upper to lower zone emphysema, CT measures of airway disease, SRTLC, RI, the ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC), and both 6-month postoperative changes in FEV 1 and maximal exercise capacity were assessed. Measurements and Main Results: Physiological measures of lung elastic recoil and inspiratory resistance were not correlatedwith improvement in either the FEV1 (R = 20.03, P = 0.78 and R = -0.17, P = 0.16, respectively) ormaximal exercise capacity (R = -0.02, P = 0.83 and R = 0.08, P = 0.53, respectively). The RV/TLC ratio and CT measures of emphysema and its upper to lower zone ratio were only weakly predictive of postoperative changes in both the FEV1 (R = 0.11, P = 0.01; R = 0.2, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.23, P < 0.0001, respectively) and maximalexercise capacity (R = 0.17,P = 0.0001;R = 0.15,P = 0.002;and R = 0.15,P = 0.002, respectively).CTassessmentsofairwaydiseasewere not predictive of change in FEV1 or exercise capacity in this cohort. Conclusions: The RV/TLC ratio and CT measures of emphysema and its distribution are weak but statistically significant predictors of outcome after LVRS.
AB - Rationale: Previous investigations have identified several potential predictors of outcomes from lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). A concern regarding these studies has been their small sample size, which may limit generalizability. We therefore sought to examine radiographic and physiologic predictors of surgical outcomes in a large, multicenter clinical investigation, the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. Objectives: To identify objective radiographic and physiological indices of lung disease that have prognostic value in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease being evaluated for LVRS. Methods: A subset of the subjects undergoing LVRS in the National EmphysemaTreatment Trialunderwent preoperativehigh-resolution computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the chest and measures of static lung recoil at total lung capacity (SRTLC) and inspiratory resistance (RI). The relationship between CT measures of emphysema, the ratio of upper to lower zone emphysema, CT measures of airway disease, SRTLC, RI, the ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC), and both 6-month postoperative changes in FEV 1 and maximal exercise capacity were assessed. Measurements and Main Results: Physiological measures of lung elastic recoil and inspiratory resistance were not correlatedwith improvement in either the FEV1 (R = 20.03, P = 0.78 and R = -0.17, P = 0.16, respectively) ormaximal exercise capacity (R = -0.02, P = 0.83 and R = 0.08, P = 0.53, respectively). The RV/TLC ratio and CT measures of emphysema and its upper to lower zone ratio were only weakly predictive of postoperative changes in both the FEV1 (R = 0.11, P = 0.01; R = 0.2, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.23, P < 0.0001, respectively) and maximalexercise capacity (R = 0.17,P = 0.0001;R = 0.15,P = 0.002;and R = 0.15,P = 0.002, respectively).CTassessmentsofairwaydiseasewere not predictive of change in FEV1 or exercise capacity in this cohort. Conclusions: The RV/TLC ratio and CT measures of emphysema and its distribution are weak but statistically significant predictors of outcome after LVRS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649137617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649137617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.200906-0911OC
DO - 10.1164/rccm.200906-0911OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 19965810
AN - SCOPUS:77649137617
VL - 181
SP - 494
EP - 500
JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
SN - 1073-449X
IS - 5
ER -